Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Acute High-Grade Acromioclavicular Dislocations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:32
作者
Chang, Nicholas [1 ]
Furey, Andrew [1 ]
Kurdin, Anton [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Univ, Div Orthopaed Surg, Dept Surg, Fac Med, St John, NF, Canada
关键词
acromioclavicular; dislocation; systematic review; meta-analysis; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; JOINT; RELIABILITY; SEPARATIONS;
D O I
10.1097/BOT.0000000000001004
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Management of high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations has been controversial. Recent studies suggest no difference in outcomes between operative and nonoperative management of Rockwood types III-V injuries. The objective of this meta-analysis is to compare outcomes between operative and nonoperative management of high-grade AC joint dislocations. Data Sources: Search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases through October 2016. A broad search strategy was used to identify English, comparative studies of AC joint dislocations. Study Selection: Inclusion criteria included comparative studies of AC joint dislocations in adult patients with acute, high-grade AC dislocations. Data Extraction: Two authors independently reviewed and assessed for bias according to the U.S. Preventative Task Force Quality Rating Criteria. Data were extracted for validated functional scores, clinical and radiographic outcomes, and complications. Data Synthesis: Nineteen studies (n = 954) were included in the meta-analysis. Operative group had better cosmetic outcome (odds ratio [OR] = 0.05; P < 0.00001) and radiographic reduction (OR = 24.94; P < 0.0001). Constant scores favored the operative group, although the difference may not be clinically significant (MD = 3.14; P = 0.03). Nonoperative treatment was associated with faster return to work (MD = 4.17, P < 0.0001), lower implant complications (OR = 7.19, P < 0.0001), and reduced infection rate (OR = 3.65, P = 0.007). No difference was found for DASH Score, return to sport, radiologic evidence of osteoarthritis, and need for surgery after failed management. Conclusions: No clinical difference in functional outcome scores was detected between operative and nonoperative management of high-grade AC joint dislocations. Patients in the nonoperative cohort had a more rapid return to work, but were associated with a poorer cosmetic outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, BMJ CLIN EVIDENCE
  • [3] [Anonymous], COCHR HIGHL SENS SEA
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2015, EUR ORTHOP TRAUMATOL
  • [5] BAKALIM G, 1975, ACTA CHIR SCAND, V141, P43
  • [6] THE MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE ACROMIOCLAVICULAR DISLOCATION - A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE CONTROLLED TRIAL
    BANNISTER, GC
    WALLACE, WA
    STABLEFORTH, PG
    HUTSON, MA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1989, 71 (05): : 848 - 850
  • [7] Bosworth BM., 1941, Surg Gynecol Obstet, V73, P866
  • [8] Clinical and radiologic outcomes of surgical and conservative treatment of type III acromioclavicular joint injury
    Calvo, E
    López-Franco, M
    Arribas, IM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2006, 15 (03) : 300 - 305
  • [9] Grade III acromioclavicular joint injury in Australian Rules Football
    Cardone, D
    Brown, JN
    Roberts, SNJ
    Hayes, MG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT, 2002, 5 (02) : 143 - 148
  • [10] Treatment of acute grade III acromioclavicular dislocation: A lack of evidence
    Ceccarelli E.
    Bondí R.
    Alviti F.
    Garofalo R.
    Miulli F.
    Padua R.
    [J]. Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2008, 9 (2) : 105 - 108