Parallel Accumulation-Serial Fragmentation (PASEF): Multiplying Sequencing Speed and Sensitivity by Synchronized Scans in a Trapped Ion Mobility Device

被引:262
作者
Meier, Florian [1 ]
Beck, Scarlet [1 ]
Grassl, Niklas [1 ]
Lubeck, Markus [2 ]
Park, Melvin A. [3 ]
Raether, Oliver [2 ]
Mann, Matthias [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Biochem, Prote & Signal Transduct, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany
[2] Bruker Daltonik GmbH, D-28359 Bremen, Germany
[3] Bruker Daltonics Inc, Billerica, MA 01821 USA
关键词
proteomics; MS/MS; ion mobility; TIMS; peptide sequencing; multiplexing; time-of-flight; high resolution; GAS-PHASE SEPARATIONS; MASS-SPECTROMETRY; QUADRUPOLE; PERFORMANCE; IMPACT; PROTEOME; SPECTRA;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00932
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based proteomics, many precursors elute from the column simultaneously. In data-dependent analyses, these precursors are fragmented one at a time, whereas the others are discarded entirely. Here we employ trapped ion mobility spectrometry (TIMS) on an orthogonal quadrupole time-of-flight (QTOF) mass spectrometer to remove this limitation. In TIMS, all precursor ions are accumulated in parallel and released sequentially as a function of their ion mobility. Instead of selecting a single precursor mass with the quadrupole mass filter, we here implement synchronized scans in which the quadrupole is mass positioned with sub-millisecond switching times at the m/z values of appropriate precursors, such as those derived from a topN precursor list. We demonstrate serial selection and fragmentation of multiple precursors in single 50 ms TIMS scans. Parallel accumulation serial fragmentation (PASEF) enables hundreds of MS/MS events per second at full sensitivity. Modeling the effect of such synchronized scans for shotgun proteomics, we estimate that about a 10-fold gain in sequencing speed should be achievable by PASEF without a decrease in sensitivity.
引用
收藏
页码:5378 / 5387
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Mass spectrometry-based proteomics
    Aebersold, R
    Mann, M
    [J]. NATURE, 2003, 422 (6928) : 198 - 207
  • [2] Next-generation proteomics: towards an integrative view of proteome dynamics
    Altelaar, A. F. Maarten
    Munoz, Javier
    Heck, Albert J. R.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2013, 14 (01) : 35 - 48
  • [3] Performance Characteristics of a New Hybrid Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Tandem Mass Spectrometer (TripleTOF 5600)
    Andrews, Genna L.
    Simons, Brigitte L.
    Young, J. Bryce
    Hawkridge, Adam M.
    Muddiman, David C.
    [J]. ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2011, 83 (13) : 5442 - 5446
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2014, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
  • [5] The Impact II, a Very High-Resolution Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Instrument (QTOF) for Deep Shotgun Proteomics
    Beck, Scarlet
    Michalski, Annette
    Raether, Oliver
    Lubeck, Markus
    Kaspar, Stephanie
    Goedecke, Niels
    Baessmann, Carsten
    Hornburg, Daniel
    Meier, Florian
    Paron, Igor
    Kulak, Nils A.
    Cox, Juergen
    Mann, Matthias
    [J]. MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS, 2015, 14 (07) : 2014 - 2029
  • [6] A practical guide to the MaxQuant computational platform for SILAC-based quantitative proteomics
    Cox, Juergen
    Matic, Ivan
    Hilger, Maximiliane
    Nagaraj, Nagarjuna
    Selbach, Matthias
    Olsen, Jesper V.
    Mann, Matthias
    [J]. NATURE PROTOCOLS, 2009, 4 (05) : 698 - 705
  • [7] The biological impact of mass-spectrometry-based proteomics
    Cravatt, Benjamin F.
    Simon, Gabriel M.
    Yates, John R., III
    [J]. NATURE, 2007, 450 (7172) : 991 - 1000
  • [8] Review on Ion Mobility Spectrometry. Part 1: current instrumentation
    Cumeras, R.
    Figueras, E.
    Davis, C. E.
    Baumbach, J. I.
    Gracia, I.
    [J]. ANALYST, 2015, 140 (05) : 1376 - 1390
  • [9] Distler U, 2014, NAT METHODS, V11, P167, DOI [10.1038/NMETH.2767, 10.1038/nmeth.2767]
  • [10] Note: Integration of trapped ion mobility spectrometry with mass spectrometry
    Fernandez-Lima, F. A.
    Kaplan, D. A.
    Park, M. A.
    [J]. REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 2011, 82 (12)