Etomidate for procedural sedation in the emergency department

被引:27
作者
Keim, SM
Erstad, BL
Sakles, JC
Davis, V
机构
[1] Arizona Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Div Emergency Med, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
[2] Arizona Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Pharm Practice & Sci, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
来源
PHARMACOTHERAPY | 2002年 / 22卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1592/phco.22.8.586.33204
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Study Objective. To review our experience with etomidate in nonintubated patients in the emergency department. Design. A 2-year retrospective chart review of consecutive patients receiving etomidate for sedation. Setting. Emergency department of a university-based teaching hospital. Patients. Forty-eight patients who underwent painful procedures in the emergency department. Measurements and Main Results. Demographics, dosing information, recovery times, and adverse events were abstracted using a standardized data collection form. Forty-eight nonintubated patients were sedated with etomidate. Mean age was 34 years (range 6-80 yrs); 38 were men and 10 women; two were children. The mean initial dose of etomidate was 13 mg. Adverse events occurred in 11 (21%) patients. None sustained any substantial morbidity as indicated by need for intubation, prolonged emergency department stay, or hospital admission. Conclusion. Although controversial, etomidate holds promise as a potent sedative agent for patients undergoing painful procedures in the emergency department. A large prospective evaluation is needed to document the performance and complications of this agent.
引用
收藏
页码:586 / 592
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
ALLOLIO B, 1983, LANCET, V2, P626
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Ann Emerg Med, V31, P663
[3]  
Beattie C, 2001, GOODMAN GILMANS PHAR, P321
[4]  
Bergen Joseph M., 1997, Journal of Emergency Medicine, V15, P221, DOI 10.1016/S0736-4679(96)00350-2
[5]   Pharmacology of emergency department pain management and conscious sedation [J].
Blackburn, P ;
Vissers, R .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2000, 18 (04) :803-+
[6]  
BOIDIN M P, 1986, Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica, V37, P213
[7]   NASPE expert consensus document: Use of IV (conscious) sedation/analgesia by nonanesthesia personnel in patients undergoing arrhythmia specific diagnostic, therapeutic, and surgical procedures [J].
Bubien, RS ;
Fisher, JD ;
Gentzel, JA ;
Murphy, EK ;
Irwin, ME ;
Shea, JB ;
Dick, M ;
Ching, E ;
Wilkoff, BL ;
Benditt, DG .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 21 (02) :375-385
[8]   Emergency department evaluation of chest pain using exercise stress echocardiography [J].
Buchsbaum, MS ;
Marshall, ES ;
Levine, BJ ;
Bennett, MA ;
DiSabatino, A ;
O'Connor, RE ;
Jasani, NB .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 8 (02) :196-199
[9]   COMPARISON OF THE VENTILATORY EFFECTS OF ETOMIDATE AND METHOHEXITAL [J].
CHOI, SD ;
SPAULDING, BC ;
GROSS, JB ;
APFELBAUM, JL .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1985, 62 (04) :442-447
[10]   ENDOCRINOLOGIC CHANGES FOLLOWING ETOMIDATE, MIDAZOLAM, OR METHOHEXITAL FOR MINOR SURGERY [J].
CROZIER, TA ;
BECK, D ;
SCHLAEGER, M ;
WUTTKE, W ;
KETTLER, D .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1987, 66 (05) :628-635