Evaluation of the use of digital study models in postgraduate orthodontic programs in the United States and Canada

被引:16
作者
Shastry, Shruti [1 ]
Park, Jae Hyun [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] AT Still Univ, Arizona Sch Dent & Oral Hlth, Mesa, AZ 85206 USA
[2] AT Still Univ, Postgrad Orthodont Program, Arizona Sch Dent & Oral Hlth, Mesa, AZ 85206 USA
[3] Kyung Hee Univ, Grad Sch Dent, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Digital models; Study models; Postgraduate orthodontic programs; OBJECTIVE GRADING SYSTEM; SPACE ANALYSIS; TOOTH-SIZE; PLASTER; ACCURACY; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; REPRODUCIBILITY;
D O I
10.2319/030813-197.1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the extent, experience, and trends associated with digital model use, as well as the advantages of using a particular study model type (digital or plaster) in postgraduate orthodontic programs in the United States and Canada. Materials and Methods: An electronic survey consisting of 14 questions was sent to 72 program directors or chairpersons of accredited orthodontic postgraduate programs in the United States and Canada. Results: Fifty-one responded for a 71% response rate. Sixty-five percent of the schools use plaster study models compared with 35% that use digital models. The most common advantages of plaster models were a three-dimensional feel and the ability for them to be mounted on an articulator. The most common advantages of digital models were the ease of storage and retrieval, and the residents' exposure to new technology. About one third of the plaster model users reported that they wanted to switch to digital models in the future, with 12% planning to do so within 1 year. Conclusions: Based on our study, 35% of accredited orthodontic postgraduate programs in the United States and Canada are using digital study models in most cases treated in their programs, and the trend is for increased digital model use in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 67
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
American Board of Orthodontics, EX PROC
[2]  
[Anonymous], CAS PREP
[3]  
Bell A, 2003, J Orthod, V30, P219, DOI 10.1093/ortho/30.3.219
[4]   Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity [J].
Bootvong, K. ;
Liu, Z. ;
McGrath, C. ;
Haegg, U. ;
Wong, Ricky W. K. ;
Bendeus, M. ;
Yeung, S. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2010, 32 (05) :589-595
[5]   Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts [J].
Costalos, PA ;
Sarraf, K ;
Cangialosi, TJ ;
Efstratiadis, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2005, 128 (05) :624-629
[6]   Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: A validation study [J].
Cuperus, Anne Margreet R. ;
Harms, Marit C. ;
Rangel, Frits A. ;
Bronkhorst, Ewald M. ;
Schols, Jan G. J. H. ;
Breuning, K. Hero .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 142 (03) :308-313
[7]  
Dalstra M, 2009, J ORTHOD, V36, P36, DOI 10.1179/14653120722905
[8]  
Favero Lorenzo, 2009, Prog Orthod, V10, P16
[9]   Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review [J].
Fleming, P. S. ;
Marinho, V. ;
Johal, A. .
ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2011, 14 (01) :1-16
[10]  
Goonewardene RW, 2008, AUST ORTHOD J, V24, P83