Open Access Publishing Trends in the Forest Sciences

被引:0
作者
O'Hara, Kevin L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, 130 Mulford Hall,MC 3114, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
open access; scholarly publishing; publishing trends; Clarivate Analytics;
D O I
10.3390/f10030238
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Open access models for academic publishing offer an alternative to traditional subscription-based journals. In the open access model, the author generally retains the copyright and the published articles are available free on the internet. Publication costs are either borne by the author as article processing charges, or are free for some journals published by societies or institutions. Traditional subscription-based journals are funded by subscription costs to libraries and individuals, the publisher retains the copyright, and these journals are generally not freely available to the public. This traditional model has created two problems: (1) many for-profit publishers control access in a form of oligopoly and impose high costs to subscribers; and (2) it limits access of scientific information to the public which disproportionately affects poorly funded research institutions and developing countries. Other subscription-based journals are published by scientific and professional societies but are not "for-profit". In the forest sciences, several open access journals emerged in the last 10-15 years. These open access journals are published by for-profit publishing companies, research institutions, and professional societies. Some of these journals have been successful at attracting manuscript submissions, becoming indexed by various indexation services, and have seen metrics representing their importance increase over time. This paper documents these trends and assesses the viability of the open access model in the forest sciences and compares them to other types of journals.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [21] The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009
    Laakso, Mikael
    Welling, Patrik
    Bukvova, Helena
    Nyman, Linus
    Bjork, Bo-Christer
    Hedlund, Turid
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (06):
  • [22] The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era
    Lariviere, Vincent
    Haustein, Stefanie
    Mongeon, Philippe
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (06):
  • [23] MacDonald F., 2015, SCI ALERT 0610
  • [24] Nicholson D, 2015, WORLD EC FORUM
  • [25] The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles
    Piwowar, Heather
    Priem, Jason
    Lariviere, Vincent
    Alperin, Juan Pablo
    Matthias, Lisa
    Norlander, Bree
    Farley, Ashley
    West, Jevin
    Haustein, Stefanie
    [J]. PEERJ, 2018, 6
  • [26] Sample I., 2012, GUARDIAN
  • [27] Seglen PO, 1997, BRIT MED J, V314, P498
  • [28] Smith K.L., 2016, OPEN ACCESS POLICY A
  • [29] Stokstad E., 2018, Science
  • [30] SSCI and its impact factors: a "prisoner's dilemma"?
    Svensson, Goran
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2010, 44 (1-2) : 23 - 33