Open Access Publishing Trends in the Forest Sciences

被引:0
作者
O'Hara, Kevin L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, 130 Mulford Hall,MC 3114, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
open access; scholarly publishing; publishing trends; Clarivate Analytics;
D O I
10.3390/f10030238
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Open access models for academic publishing offer an alternative to traditional subscription-based journals. In the open access model, the author generally retains the copyright and the published articles are available free on the internet. Publication costs are either borne by the author as article processing charges, or are free for some journals published by societies or institutions. Traditional subscription-based journals are funded by subscription costs to libraries and individuals, the publisher retains the copyright, and these journals are generally not freely available to the public. This traditional model has created two problems: (1) many for-profit publishers control access in a form of oligopoly and impose high costs to subscribers; and (2) it limits access of scientific information to the public which disproportionately affects poorly funded research institutions and developing countries. Other subscription-based journals are published by scientific and professional societies but are not "for-profit". In the forest sciences, several open access journals emerged in the last 10-15 years. These open access journals are published by for-profit publishing companies, research institutions, and professional societies. Some of these journals have been successful at attracting manuscript submissions, becoming indexed by various indexation services, and have seen metrics representing their importance increase over time. This paper documents these trends and assesses the viability of the open access model in the forest sciences and compares them to other types of journals.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Anderson Rick, 2018, Scholarly Communication: What Eve- ryone Needs to Know
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2019, ATLANTIC
  • [3] Arunachalam S, 2004, NATL MED J INDIA, V17, P289
  • [4] Social Justice in Scholarly Publishing: Open Access Is the Only Way
    Arunachalam, Subbiah
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2017, 17 (10) : 15 - 17
  • [5] Predatory publishers are corrupting open access
    Beall, Jeffrey
    [J]. NATURE, 2012, 489 (7415) : 179 - 179
  • [6] Bergstrom CT, 2006, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V4, P488, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[488:TEOEJ]2.0.CO
  • [7] 2
  • [8] Free labor for costly journals?
    Bergstrom, TC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2001, 15 (04) : 183 - 198
  • [9] Evaluating big deal journal bundles
    Bergstrom, Theodore C.
    Courant, Paul N.
    McAfee, R. Preston
    Williams, Michael A.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2014, 111 (26) : 9425 - 9430
  • [10] Buranyi Stephen, 2017, The Guardian