IMPACT OF USE OF CHEMICAL TRANSFORMATION MODULES IN CALPUFF ON THE RESULTS OF AIR DISPERSION MODELLING

被引:7
作者
Oleniacz, Robert [1 ]
Rzeszutek, Mateusz [1 ]
Bogacki, Marek [1 ]
机构
[1] AGH Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Environm Management & Protect, Al A Mickiewicza 30, PL-30059 Krakow, Poland
来源
ECOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY AND ENGINEERING S-CHEMIA I INZYNIERIA EKOLOGICZNA S | 2016年 / 23卷 / 04期
关键词
air pollution modelling; CALPUFF; atmospheric chemical transformations; secondary inorganic aerosols; large combustion plants; POWER-PLANT EMISSIONS; THERMODYNAMIC-EQUILIBRIUM MODEL; INDUSTRIAL SOURCE APPLICATIONS; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; AERMOD; QUALITY; ISORROPIA; EVALUATE; TRACER;
D O I
10.1515/eces-2016-0043
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Assessment of the impact on air quality for combustion sources should be carried out using advanced modelling systems with chemical transformation modules taken into account, especially for the facilities characterized by significant emission of gaseous air pollutants (including SO2). This approach increases the reliability of the obtained evaluation results by modelling the formation of secondary inorganic aerosol (SIA) in the air which can substantially contribute to PM10. This paper assesses in this regard selected chemical transformation modules (MESOPUFF, RIVAD/ARM3, ISORROPIA/RIVAD) available in the CALPUFF model (v. 6.42) and its application in the atmospheric dispersion modelling of air emissions from a coal- fired large combustion plant (LCP) not equipped with a flue gas desulphurization (FGD) system. It has been proven that consideration an additional mechanism of secondary sulfate aerosol formation in aqueous phase in the ISORROPIA/RIVAD module (AQUA option) causes a significant increase in the annual average concentration of PM10 in the air compared to the other considered options, along with the calculation variant which excludes chemical transformation mechanisms. Type of the selected chemical transformation module has no significant effect on the results of modelled NO, NO2 and NOx concentrations in the air. However, it can lead to different SO2 results, especially for annual averaged, and in some points, for the hourly averaged concentrations.
引用
收藏
页码:605 / 620
页数:16
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Apostol M, 2015, WYBRANE ZAGADNIENIA, DOI 10.13140/RG.2.1.2907.1440
[2]   AN UPDATED CHEMICAL MECHANISM FOR HYDROCARBON/NOX/SO2 PHOTO-OXIDATIONS SUITABLE FOR INCLUSION IN ATMOSPHERIC SIMULATION-MODELS [J].
ATKINSON, R ;
LLOYD, AC ;
WINGES, L .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1982, 16 (06) :1341-1355
[3]  
CERC, 2013, ADMS 5 0 FLAT TERR V
[4]   AERMOD: A dispersion model for industrial source applications. Part I: General model formulation and boundary layer characterization [J].
Cimorelli, AJ ;
Perry, SG ;
Venkatram, A ;
Weil, JC ;
Paine, RJ ;
Wilson, RB ;
Lee, RF ;
Peters, WD ;
Brode, RW .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY, 2005, 44 (05) :682-693
[5]   A tracer experiment study to evaluate the CALPUFF real time application in a near-field complex terrain setting [J].
Cui, Huiling ;
Yao, Rentai ;
Xu, Xiangjun ;
Xin, Cuntian ;
Yang, Jinming .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 45 (39) :7525-7532
[6]   CALPUFF and AERMOD Model Validation Study in the Near Field: Martins Creek Revisited [J].
Dresser, Alan L. ;
Huizer, Robert D. .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2011, 61 (06) :647-659
[7]  
EEA, 2016, AIR QUAL E REP AQ E
[8]  
ENVIRON International Corporation, 2012, 406018 ENV INT CORP
[9]  
EPA U., 2005, Federal Register, V70, P68218
[10]  
European Environment Agency (EEA), AIRBASE EUR AIR QUAL