Optimizing the clinical utility of sirolimus-based immunosuppression for kidney transplantation

被引:13
|
作者
Tedesco-Silva, Helio [1 ]
del Carmen Rial, Maria [2 ]
Cruz Santiago, Jose [3 ]
Mazzali, Marilda [4 ]
Pacheco-Silva, Alvaro [1 ,5 ]
Torres, Rodolfo [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Hosp Rim, Div Nefrol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Nephrol SA, Inst Nefrol, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[3] IMSS Mexico, Hosp Especialidades CMN La Raza, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[4] Univ Estadual Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[5] Hosp Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[6] Fdn Univ Ciencias Salud, Clin Univ Colombia, Bogota, Colombia
关键词
calcineurin inhibitors; complementary therapies; immunosuppressive agents; Rapamune; renal transplantation; sirolimus; administration & dosage; transplant recipients; INHIBITOR-BASED IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; REDUCED-EXPOSURE CYCLOSPORINE; WOUND-HEALING COMPLICATIONS; BK VIRUS NEPHROPATHY; DE-NOVO SIROLIMUS; MYCOPHENOLATE-MOFETIL; CALCINEURIN-INHIBITOR; RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; MAMMALIAN TARGET;
D O I
10.1111/ctr.13464
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
While calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are effective for preventing acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients, long-term use may cause chronic kidney injury and is associated with increased risks of cardiovascular events, cancer, and infection-associated death. Immunosuppression strategies are needed to balance risks of acute and subclinical rejection with long-term benefits of improved kidney function. Sirolimus, an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin, is used for immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. Its clinical utility has evolved, over more than 15 years, including de novo sirolimus with and without concomitant CNIs and conversion from CNI-based regimens to sirolimus. Sirolimus-containing regimens are associated with preservation of good renal function, with promising characteristics for improving long-term graft and patient survival, including antiviral and anticancer effects. Based on clinical evidence, use of low-dose sirolimus in a de novo approach with tacrolimus/steroids in the immediate posttransplantation period is appropriate. A feasible alternative is a long term, CNI-free combination with mycophenolate mofetil (following CNI-to-sirolimus conversion at 3-6 months). These strategies are appropriate for a broad range of patients with various levels of immunologic risk, including those receiving expanded criteria donor kidneys or at increased risk of delayed graft function, particular challenges in Latin America and other global regions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The effect of sirolimus-based immunosuppression vs. conventional prophylaxis therapy on cytomegalovirus infection after liver transplantation
    Liu Sheng
    Shi Jun
    Li Jianfeng
    Gao Lianghui
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 29 (06) : 555 - 559
  • [32] Limiting Hepatitis C Virus Progression in Liver Transplant Recipients Using Sirolimus-Based Immunosuppression
    McKenna, G. J.
    Trotter, J. F.
    Klintmalm, E.
    Onaca, N.
    Ruiz, R.
    Jennings, L. W.
    Neri, M.
    O'Leary, J. G.
    Davis, G. L.
    Levy, M. F.
    Goldstein, R. M.
    Klintmalm, G. B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 11 (11) : 2379 - 2387
  • [33] Prospective Observational Study of Sirolimus as Primary Immunosuppression After Renal Transplantation
    Pescovitz, Mark D.
    Nezakatgoo, Nosratollah
    Lorber, Marc I.
    Nashan, Bjorn
    Tedesco-Silva, Helio, Jr.
    Kasiske, Bertram L.
    Juarez de la Cruz, Federico J.
    Russ, Graeme
    Campistol, Joseph
    Keown, Paul A.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 88 (08) : 1010 - 1018
  • [34] Early conversion to a sirolimus-based, calcineurin-inhibitor-free immunosuppression in the SMART trial: observational results at 24 and 36 months after transplantation
    Guba, Markus
    Pratschke, Johann
    Hugo, Christian
    Kraemer, Bernhard K.
    Pascher, Andreas
    Pressmar, Katharina
    Hakenberg, Oliver
    Fischereder, Michael
    Brockmann, Jens
    Andrassy, Joachim
    Banas, Bernhard
    Jauch, Karl-Walter
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 25 (04) : 416 - 423
  • [35] Comparison of sirolimus with low-dose tacrolimus versus sirolimus-based calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen in live donor renal transplantation
    Hamdy, AF
    El-Agroudy, AE
    Bakr, MA
    Mostafa, A
    El-baz, M
    El-Shahawy, EM
    Ghoneim, MA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 5 (10) : 2531 - 2538
  • [36] Intrarenal vascular resistance parameters in kidney transplant patients receiving calcineurin inhibitor-based or sirolimus-based regimens
    Lee, Po-Chu
    Lee, Chih-Yuan
    Hu, Rey-Heng
    Lo, Chiao
    Tsai, Meng-Kun
    Lee, Po-Huang
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 25 (05) : 1675 - 1680
  • [37] Mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression with sirolimus in renal transplantation: a randomized, controlled Spare-the-Nephron trial
    Weir, Matthew R.
    Mulgaonkar, Shamkant
    Chan, Laurence
    Shidban, Hamid
    Waid, Thomas H.
    Preston, Dennis
    Kalil, Roberto N.
    Pearson, Thomas C.
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 79 (08) : 897 - 907
  • [38] Planned Randomized Conversion From Tacrolimus to Sirolimus-Based Immunosuppressive Regimen in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients
    Silva, H. T., Jr.
    Felipe, C. R.
    Garcia, V. D.
    Neto, E. D.
    Filho, M. A.
    Contieri, F. L. C.
    de Carvalho, D. D. B. M.
    Pestana, J. O. M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 13 (12) : 3155 - 3163
  • [39] Everolimus immunosuppression in kidney transplantation: What is the optimal strategy?
    Witzke, Oliver
    Sommerer, Claudia
    Arns, Wolfgang
    TRANSPLANTATION REVIEWS, 2016, 30 (01) : 3 - 12
  • [40] De novo sirolimus-based immunosuppression after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Long-term outcomes and side effects
    Toso, Christian
    Meeberg, Glenda A.
    Bigam, David L.
    Oberholzer, Jose
    Shapiro, A. M. James
    Gutfreund, Klaus
    Ma, Mang M.
    Mason, Andrew L.
    Wong, Winnie W. S.
    Bain, Vincent G.
    Kneteman, Norman M.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 83 (09) : 1162 - 1168