Appropriate time for selective biliary cannulation by trainees during ERCP - a randomized trial

被引:35
作者
Pan, Yanglin [1 ]
Zhao, Lina [2 ]
Leung, Joseph [3 ]
Zhang, Rongchun [1 ]
Luo, Hui [1 ]
Wang, Xiangping [1 ]
Liu, Zhiguo [1 ]
Wan, Bingnian [1 ,4 ]
Tao, Qin [1 ]
Yao, Shaowei [1 ]
Hui, Na [1 ]
Fan, Daiming [1 ]
Wu, Kaichun [1 ]
Guo, Xuegang [1 ]
机构
[1] Fourth Mil Med Univ, Xijing Hosp Digest Dis, Xian 710032, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Fourth Mil Med Univ, Dept Radiotherapy, Xijing Hosp, Xian 710032, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] VANCHCS, Gastroenterol, Sacramento VA Med Ctr, Mather & UC Davis Med Ctr, Sacramento, CA USA
[4] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army 12 Hosp, Kashi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
RISK-FACTORS; STANDARDS SET; PANCREATITIS; COMPETENCE; SPHINCTEROTOMY; PERFORMANCE; ENDOSCOPY; GUIDELINE; REDUCE;
D O I
10.1055/s-0034-1391564
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and study aim: The allocation of sufficient time for trainees to attempt cannulation is necessary for learning and to ensure success with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) training. However, it is important to balance the benefit to trainee practice against the potential risks to patients. The appropriate time for attempted cannulation by trainees remains unclear. Patients and methods: Three different time limits (5, 10, 15 minutes) were set for cannulation attempts made by four trainees in patients with native papilla undergoing ERCP. Patients were randomly assigned to the 5-, 10-, or 15-minute groups in a 1: 1: 1 ratio. Rectal indomethacin was used in high-risk patients. The primary outcome was successful cannulation within the allocated time. Secondary outcomes included performance scores, overall success rate, and post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Results: A total of 256 patients were randomly assigned to the 5-minute (n=84), 10-minute (n=86), or 15-minute (n=86) groups. Patients' base-line characteristics were comparable. Success rates for selective bile duct cannulation by trainees were 43.8 %, 75.0 %, and 71.8% in the 5-, 10-, and 15-minute groups, respectively (P<0.001). Trainees' self-reported performance scores and video assessment by an independent reviewer were comparable between the 10- and 15-minute groups, which were higher than the 5-minute group (both P < 0.001). Trainers took over the cannulation procedure when trainees did not succeed within the allocated time. There was no significant difference in the overall success rates in cannulation between the three groups. No differences were noted in the use of rectal indomethacin and overall complication rates. Four patients in each group developed PEP (P=0.996). Conclusion: A time of 10 minutes was considered to be appropriate for trainees to attempt cannulation, with acceptable cannulation success rates and complications.
引用
收藏
页码:688 / 695
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Ang TL, 2011, SINGAP MED J, V52, P654
[2]   Needle-knife sphincterotomy: factors predicting its use and the relationship with post-ERCP pancreatitis (with video) [J].
Bailey, Adam A. ;
Bourke, Michael J. ;
Kaffes, Arthur J. ;
Byth, Karen ;
Lee, Eric Y. ;
Williams, Stephen J. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 71 (02) :266-271
[3]   Are we meeting the standards set for ERCP? [J].
Baillie, John ;
Testoni, Pier-Alberto .
GUT, 2007, 56 (06) :744-746
[4]   Quality indicators for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [J].
Baron, TH ;
Petersen, BT ;
Mergener, K ;
Chak, A ;
Cohen, J ;
Deal, SE ;
Hoffman, B ;
Jacobson, BC ;
Petrini, JL ;
Safdi, MA ;
Faigel, DO ;
Pike, IM .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 63 (04) :S29-S34
[5]   Face and construct validity of a computer-based virtual reality simulator for ERCP [J].
Bittner, James G. ;
Mellinger, John D. ;
Imam, Toufic ;
Schade, Robert R. ;
MacFadyen, Bruce V., Jr. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 71 (02) :357-364
[6]   Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: A prospective multicenter study [J].
Cheng, CL ;
Sherman, S ;
Watkins, JL ;
Barnett, J ;
Freeman, M ;
Geenen, J ;
Ryan, M ;
Parker, H ;
Frakes, JT ;
Fogel, EL ;
Silverman, WB ;
Dua, KS ;
Aliperti, G ;
Yakshe, P ;
Uzer, M ;
Jones, W ;
Goff, J ;
Lazzell-Pannell, L ;
Rashdan, A ;
Temkit, M ;
Lehman, GA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 101 (01) :139-147
[7]   Endoscopic biliopancreatic investigations and therapy [J].
Costamagna, Guido ;
Familiari, Pietro ;
Marchese, Michele ;
Tringali, Andrea .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 22 (05) :865-881
[8]  
Cotton Peter B, 2012, Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, V22, P587, DOI 10.1016/j.giec.2012.05.002
[9]   ERCP: pearls of wisdom from master endoscopists [J].
Cotton, Peter B. ;
Leung, Joseph W. ;
Reddy, D. Nageshwar ;
Baron, Todd H. ;
Carr-Locke, David L. ;
Lee, Jeffrey H. ;
Singhania, Rohit .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 73 (06) :1255-1258
[10]   Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years [J].
Cotton, Peter B. ;
Garrow, Donald A. ;
Gallagher, Joseph ;
Romagnuolo, Joseph .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 70 (01) :80-88