Strict X-ray beam collimation for facial bones examination can increase lens exposure

被引:8
作者
Powys, R. [1 ]
Robinson, J. [1 ]
Kench, P. L. [1 ]
Ryan, J. [1 ]
Brennan, P. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Discipline Med Radiat Sci, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
RADIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1259/bjr/19989149
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: It is well accepted that collimation is a cost-effective dose-reducing tool for X-ray examinations. This phantom-based study investigated the impact of X-ray beam collimation on radiation dose to the lenses of the eyes and thyroid along with the effect on image quality in facial bone radiography. Methods: A three-view series (occipitomental, occipitomental 30 and lateral) was investigated, and radiation doses to the lenses and thyroid were measured using an Unfors dosemeter. Images were assessed by six experienced observers using a visual grading analysis and a total of 5400 observations were made. Results: Strict collimation significantly (p<0.0001) reduced the radiation dose to the lenses of the eyes and thyroid when using a fixed projection-specific exposure. With a variable exposure technique (fixed exit dose, to simulate the behaviour of an automatic exposure control), while strict collimation was again shown to reduce thyroid dose, higher lens doses were demonstrated when compared with larger fields of exposure. Image quality was found to significantly improve using strict collimation, with observer preference being demonstrated using visual grading characteristic curves. Conclusion: The complexities of optimising radiographic techniques have been shown and the data presented emphasise the importance of examining dose-reducing strategies in a comprehensive way.
引用
收藏
页码:E497 / E505
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Bartholomew A.L., 2004, Radiography, V10, P201
[2]   Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis:: a non-parametric rank-invariant statistical method for image quality evaluation [J].
Bath, M. ;
Mansson, L. G. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2007, 80 (951) :169-176
[3]   Monitoring the eye lens: which dose quantity is adequate? [J].
Behrens, R. ;
Dietze, G. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (14) :4047-4062
[4]  
Brusin Joyce Helena, 2007, Radiol Technol, V78, P378
[5]  
Hart D., 2002, Radiation exposure of the UK population from medical and dental x-ray examinations
[6]  
Jeffery C.D., 1997, RADIOGRAPHY, V3, P165
[7]   COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY OF FRACTURED SKULLS [J].
LANGEN, HJ ;
KLEIN, HM ;
WEIN, B ;
STARGARDT, A ;
GUNTHER, RW .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1993, 28 (08) :686-689
[8]   A comparison of two or three radiographic views in the diagnosis of skull fractures [J].
McGlinchey, I ;
Fleet, MF ;
Eatock, FC ;
Raby, ND .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1998, 53 (03) :215-217
[9]  
McLean D, 2001, QUALITY ASSURANCE DI
[10]   The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents - Typical patient radiation doses in diagnostic radiology [J].
Parry, RA ;
Glaze, SA ;
Archer, BR .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1999, 19 (05) :1289-1302