Decision-making in healthcare: a practical application of partial least square path modelling to coverage of newborn screening programmes

被引:21
作者
Fischer, Katharina E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Helmholtz Zentrum Munchen, German Res Ctr Environm Hlth, Inst Hlth Econ & Hlth Care Management, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany
[2] Univ Hamburg, Hamburg Ctr Hlth Econ, D-20354 Hamburg, Germany
来源
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING | 2012年 / 12卷
关键词
PLS; Structural equation modelling; Quantitative research; Feasibility study; Model evaluation; Non-parametric; Fourth hurdle; Reimbursement; Neonatal; Europe; TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; 4TH HURDLE; NICE; PLS; REIMBURSEMENT; PRINCIPLES; AUSTRALIA; FRAMEWORK; ACCOUNTABILITY;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6947-12-83
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Decision-making in healthcare is complex. Research on coverage decision-making has focused on comparative studies for several countries, statistical analyses for single decision-makers, the decision outcome and appraisal criteria. Accounting for decision processes extends the complexity, as they are multidimensional and process elements need to be regarded as latent constructs (composites) that are not observed directly. The objective of this study was to present a practical application of partial least square path modelling (PLS-PM) to evaluate how it offers a method for empirical analysis of decision-making in healthcare. Methods: Empirical approaches that applied PLS-PM to decision-making in healthcare were identified through a systematic literature search. PLS-PM was used as an estimation technique for a structural equation model that specified hypotheses between the components of decision processes and the reasonableness of decision-making in terms of medical, economic and other ethical criteria. The model was estimated for a sample of 55 coverage decisions on the extension of newborn screening programmes in Europe. Results were evaluated by standard reliability and validity measures for PLS-PM. Results: After modification by dropping two indicators that showed poor measures in the measurement models' quality assessment and were not meaningful for newborn screening, the structural equation model estimation produced plausible results. The presence of three influences was supported: the links between both stakeholder participation or transparency and the reasonableness of decision-making; and the effect of transparency on the degree of scientific rigour of assessment. Reliable and valid measurement models were obtained to describe the composites of 'transparency', 'participation', 'scientific rigour' and 'reasonableness'. Conclusions: The structural equation model was among the first applications of PLS-PM to coverage decision-making. It allowed testing of hypotheses in situations where there are links between several non-observable constructs. PLS-PM was compatible in accounting for the complexity of coverage decisions to obtain a more realistic perspective for empirical analysis. The model specification can be used for hypothesis testing by using larger sample sizes and for data in the full domain of health technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Bringing 'the public' into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: From principles to practice
    Abelson, Julia
    Giacomini, Mita
    Lehoux, Pascale
    Gauvin, Francois-Pieffe
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 2007, 82 (01) : 37 - 50
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, J MED ETH, V35, P12
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2008, SAS VERS 9 2
  • [4] [Anonymous], SMARTPLS 2 0
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2010, Euro Observor
  • [6] Priority setting of health interventions: The need for multi-criteria decision analysis
    Baltussen R.
    Niessen L.
    [J]. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 4 (1)
  • [7] Who Does the Numbers? The Role of Third-Party Technology Assessment to Inform Health Systems' Decision-Making about the Funding of Health Technologies
    Barbieri, Marco
    Hawkins, Neil
    Sculpher, Mark
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (02) : 193 - 201
  • [8] Seeing the nice side of cost-effectiveness analysis: A qualitative investigation of the use of CEA in nice technology appraisals
    Bryan, Stirling
    Williams, Iestyn
    McIver, Shirley
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2007, 16 (02) : 179 - 193
  • [9] Chapman G. B., 2000, DECISION MAKING HLTH
  • [10] Using Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness to Make Drug Coverage Decisions A Comparison of Britain, Australia, and Canada
    Clement, Fiona M.
    Harris, Anthony
    Li, Jing Jing
    Yong, Karen
    Lee, Karen M.
    Manns, Braden J.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 302 (13): : 1437 - 1443