Technical Note: The impact of deformable image registration methods on dose warping

被引:22
作者
Qin, An [1 ]
Liang, Jian [1 ]
Han, Xiao [2 ]
O'Connell, Nicolette [2 ]
Yan, Di [1 ]
机构
[1] Beaumont Hlth Syst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Royal Oak, MI 48073 USA
[2] Elekta Inc, Maryland Hts, MO 63043 USA
关键词
deformable image registration; adaptive radiotherapy; biomechanical model; dose warping uncertainty; EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION; ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; ORGAN REGISTRATION; RADIOTHERAPY; ALGORITHMS; HEAD; QUANTIFICATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1002/mp.12741
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeThe purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical-relevant discrepancy between doses warped by pure image based deformable image registration (IM-DIR) and by biomechanical model based DIR (BM-DIR) on intensity-homogeneous organs. Methods and materialsTen patients (5Head&Neck, 5Prostate) were included. A research DIR tool (ADMRIE_v1.12) was utilized for IM-DIR. After IM-DIR, BM-DIR was carried out for organs (parotids, bladder, and rectum) which often encompass sharp dose gradient. Briefly, high-quality tetrahedron meshes were generated and deformable vector fields (DVF) from IM-DIR were interpolated to the surface nodes of the volume meshes as boundary condition. Then, a FEM solver (ABAQUS_v6.14) was used to simulate the displacement of internal nodes, which were then interpolated to image-voxel grids to get the more physically plausible DVF. Both geometrical and subsequent dose warping discrepancies were quantified between the two DIR methods. Target registration discrepancy(TRD) was evaluated to show the geometry difference. The re-calculated doses on second CT were warped to the pre-treatment CT via two DIR. Clinical-relevant dose parameters and passing rate were compared between two types of warped dose. The correlation was evaluated between parotid shrinkage and TRD/dose discrepancy. ResultThe parotid shrunk to 75.7%9% of its pre-treatment volume and the percentage of volume with TRD>1.5mm) was 6.5%+/- 4.7%. The normalized mean-dose difference (NMDD) of IM-DIR and BM-DIR was -0.8%+/- 1.5%, with range (-4.7% to 1.5%). 2mm/2% passing rate was 99.0%+/- 1.4%. A moderate correlation was found between parotid shrinkage and TRD and NMDD. The bladder had a NMDD of -9.9%+/- 9.7%, with BM-DIR warped dose systematically higher. Only minor deviation was observed for rectum NMDD (0.5%+/- 1.1%). ConclusionImpact of DIR method on treatment dose warping is patient and organ-specific. Generally, intensity-homogeneous organs, which undergo larger deformation/shrinkage during treatment and encompass sharp dose gradient, will have greater dose warping uncertainty. For these organs, BM-DIR could be beneficial to the evaluation of DIR/dose-warping uncertainty. (c) 2018 American Association of Physicists in Medicine
引用
收藏
页码:1287 / 1294
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[21]   A Hybrid Deformable Registration Method between Helical CT and Cone-Beam CT for Prostate Patient [J].
Qin, A. ;
Liang, J. ;
Yan, D. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
[22]   Hybrid CBCT Image Deformable Organ Registration for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy Dose Assessment: Quantitative Validation Study [J].
Qin, A. ;
Liang, J. ;
Yan, D. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02) :S820-S820
[23]   Validation of a dose warping algorithm using clinically realistic scenarios [J].
Roussakis, Y. G. ;
Dehghani, H. ;
Green, S. ;
Webster, G. J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 88 (1049)
[24]   Effect of deformable registration uncertainty on lung SBRT dose accumulation [J].
Samavati, Navid ;
Velec, Michael ;
Brock, Kristy K. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (01) :233-240
[25]   A hybrid biomechanical intensity based deformable image registration of lung 4DCT [J].
Samavati, Navid ;
Velec, Michael ;
Brock, Kristy .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (08) :3359-3373
[26]   It is not appropriate to "deform" dose along with deformable image registration in adaptive radiotherapy [J].
Schultheiss, Timothy E. ;
Tome, Wolfgang A. ;
Orton, Colin G. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (11) :6531-6533
[27]  
SINGHRAO K, 2014, MED PHYS, V41
[28]   Adaptive Management of Cervical Cancer Radiotherapy [J].
Tanderup, Kari ;
Georg, Dietmar ;
Potter, Richard ;
Kirisits, Christian ;
Grau, Cai ;
Lindegaard, Jacob C. .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2010, 20 (02) :121-129
[29]  
Tetgen SH, 2015, ACM T MATH SOFTWARE, V41, P1, DOI [10.1145/2629697, DOI 10.1145/2629697]
[30]   Toward adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck patients: Feasibility study on using CT-to-CBCT deformable registration for "dose of the day" calculations [J].
Veiga, Catarina ;
McClelland, Jamie ;
Moinuddin, Syed ;
Lourenco, Ana ;
Ricketts, Kate ;
Annkah, James ;
Modat, Marc ;
Ourselin, Sebastien ;
D'Souza, Derek ;
Royle, Gary .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (03)