Learning Conditional Information

被引:17
作者
Douven, Igor [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Fac Philosophy, NL-9712 GL Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
PROBABILITY; CAUSAL; EXPLANATION; INFERENCE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-0017.2012.01443.x
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Some of the information we receive comes to us in an explicitly conditional form. It is an open question how to model the accommodation of such information in a Bayesian framework. This paper presents data suggesting that there may be no strictly Bayesian account of updating on conditionals. Specifically, the data seem to indicate that such updating at least sometimes proceeds on the basis of explanatory considerations, which famously have no home in standard Bayesian epistemology. The paper also proposes a still broadly Bayesian model of updating on conditionals that explicitly factors in explanation. The model is shown to have clear empirical content and thus to be open to empirical testing.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 263
页数:25
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CONDITIONALS NONMONO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Philosophical Theories of Probability
[3]  
[Anonymous], COGNITION CONDITIONA
[4]  
[Anonymous], COMPANION PHILOS LOG
[5]  
Barwise J., 1986, On Conditionals, P21
[6]  
BENNETT Jonathan, 2003, A philosophical Guide to Conditionals
[7]  
Bhatt Rajesh., 2006, The blackwell companion to syntax, V1, P638, DOI [DOI 10.1002/9780470996591.CH16, 10.1002/9780470996591.ch16]
[8]  
BOUTILIER C, 1995, CONDITIONALS PHILOS, P267
[9]   Radical probabilism and Bayesian conditioning [J].
Bradley, R .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2005, 72 (02) :342-364
[10]   Explanation and evidence in informal argument [J].
Brem, SK ;
Rips, LJ .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2000, 24 (04) :573-604