Comparative life cycle assessment of a reinforced concrete residential building with equivalent cross laminated timber alternatives in China

被引:29
|
作者
Duan, Zhuocheng [1 ]
Huang, Qiong [1 ]
Sun, Qiming [2 ]
Zhang, Qi [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Sch Architecture, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Technol Architecture, Dept Architecture, Zurich, Switzerland
来源
JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING | 2022年 / 62卷
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions; Life cycle primary energy; RC building; CLT building; Hybrid CLT building; ENERGY USE; EMBODIED ENERGY; CLIMATE; CONSTRUCTION; IMPACT; CARBON; WOOD; COMFORT; BALANCE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105357
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
With the development of mass timber, cross laminated timber (CLT) has gradually become a sustainable alternative to conventional building materials to alleviate the increasing energy consumption and carbon emissions by the building sector. This study aims to explore the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions (LCGHGE) and life cycle primary energy (LCPE) of three high-rise residential buildings in the cold region of China through a life cycle assessment approach. The three buildings are conventional reinforced concrete (RC), CLT and hybrid CLT buildings. The results show that CLT and hybrid CLT buildings produce 15.00% and 10.77% lower LCGHGE, respectively, compared to the RC building within a 50-year service life. A clear difference in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and primary energy (PE) in the product and construction stages is visible, with 46.52% and 37.24% of embodied GHG emissions reduced in CLT and hybrid CLT buildings, respectively, compared to the RC building. In the operational stage, RC building has lower PE and GHG emissions to CLT alternatives. The thermal mass effect has led to a 2.25% and 2.12% PE increase for space heating and cooling in CLT and hybrid CLT buildings, respectively, compared to the RC building. For the End-of-Life (EoL) stage, CLT demonstrates great recycling potential and biomass residues. The sensitivity analysis shows that the design of the low U-value of the building envelope and high-efficiency energy systems has a significant relationship with energy reduction during the operational phase of the three buildings, magnifying the impacts of the initial and EoL stages.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative life cycle assessment of cross laminated timber building and concrete building with special focus on biogenic carbon
    Andersen, Julie Hansted
    Rasmussen, Nana Lin
    Ryberg, Morten Walbech
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2022, 254
  • [2] A Comparative Cradle-to-Gate Life Cycle Assessment of Mid-Rise Office Building Construction Alternatives: Laminated Timber or Reinforced Concrete
    Robertson, Adam B.
    Lam, Frank C. F.
    Cole, Raymond J.
    BUILDINGS, 2012, 2 (03) : 245 - 270
  • [3] Life cycle assessment of a residential building with cross-laminated timber structure in Granada-Spain
    Vidal, R.
    Sanchez-Pantoja, N.
    Martinez, G.
    INFORMES DE LA CONSTRUCCION, 2019, 71 (554)
  • [4] Cross-laminated timber for building construction: A life-cycle-assessment overview
    Younis, Adel
    Dodoo, Ambrose
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2022, 52
  • [5] Impact of climate change on the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of cross-laminated timber and reinforced concrete buildings in China
    Duan, Zhuocheng
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 395
  • [6] Comparative Life-Cycle Assessment of a High-Rise Mass Timber Building with an Equivalent Reinforced Concrete Alternative Using the Athena Impact Estimator for Buildings
    Chen, Zhongjia
    Gu, Hongmei
    Bergman, Richard D.
    Liang, Shaobo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (11)
  • [7] Life cycle performance of Cross Laminated Timber mid-rise residential buildings in Australia
    Jayalath, Amitha
    Navaratnam, Satheeskumar
    Ngo, Tuan
    Mendis, Priyan
    Hewson, Nick
    Aye, Lu
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2020, 223
  • [8] Comparative assessment of shape related cross-laminated timber building typologies focusing on environmental performance
    Leskovar, Vesna Zegarac
    Zigart, Maja
    Premrov, Miroslav
    Lukman, Rebeka Kovacic
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 216 : 482 - 494
  • [9] COMPARATIVE LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF A MASS TIMBER BUILDING AND CONCRETE ALTERNATIVE
    Liang, Shaobo
    Gu, Hongmei
    Bergman, Richard
    Kelley, Stephen S.
    WOOD AND FIBER SCIENCE, 2020, 52 (02): : 217 - 229
  • [10] Life Cycle Assessment of Reprocessed Cross Laminated Timber in Latvia
    Vamza, Ilze
    Diaz, Fabian
    Resnais, Peteris
    Radzina, Antra
    Blumberga, Dagnija
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, 2021, 25 (01) : 58 - 70