Neural Correlates of Workload Transition in Multitasking: An ACT-R Model of Hysteresis Effect

被引:15
作者
Kim, Na Young [1 ]
House, Russell [2 ]
Yun, Myung H. [3 ]
Nam, Chang S. [1 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Edward P Fitts Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Psychol, Raleigh, NC USA
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
ACT-R; EEG; neural correlates; Granger causality; effective connectivity; multitasking; cognitive modeling; DIRECTED TRANSFER-FUNCTION; GRANGER CAUSALITY; HISTORY;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2018.00535
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
This study investigated the effect of task demand transitions at multiple levels of analysis including behavioral performance, subjective rating, and brain effective connectivity, and compared human data to Adaptive Control of Thought-Rational (ACT-R) simulated data. We created three stages of task demand that were performed sequentially (Low-High-Low) during AF-MATB tasks and identified differences in neural connectivity during workload transition. We used NASA-TLX, and ISA to measure the subjective mental workload that accompanies the hysteresis effect in the task demand transitions. We found significant hysteresis effects on performance and various brain network measures such as outflow of prefrontal cortex and connectivity magnitude. These findings would allow us to clarify the direction and strength of the Granger Causality under demand transitions. Therefore, these results involving the neural mechanisms of hysteresis effects in multitasking environments may be utilized in applications of neuroergonomics research. Furthermore the ability to compare data derived from human participants to data gathered by the ACT-R model allows researchers to better account for hysteresis effects in neuro-cognitive models in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Anderson J.R., 2007, CAN HUMAN MIND OCCUR, pix, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195324259.001
[2]   An integrated theory of the mind [J].
Anderson, JR ;
Bothell, D ;
Byrne, MD ;
Douglass, S ;
Lebiere, C ;
Qin, YL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2004, 111 (04) :1036-1060
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, MULTIATTRIBUTE TASK
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1983, COGNITIVE SCI SERIES
[6]   Working Memory: Theories, Models, and Controversies [J].
Baddeley, Alan .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 63, 2012, 63 :1-29
[8]   Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind [J].
Barrett, LF ;
Tugade, MM ;
Engle, RW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2004, 130 (04) :553-573
[9]  
Battiste V., 1988, P HUM FACT SOC ANN M, V32, P150, DOI [10.1177/154193128803200232, DOI 10.1177/154193128803200232]
[10]  
Bell A. J., 1995, TECHNOLOGY, V1159, P1129, DOI [10.1162/neco.1995.7.6.1129, DOI 10.1162/NECO.1995.7.6.1129]