Simulation and psychology: creating, recognizing and using learning opportunities

被引:24
作者
Dieckmann, Peter [1 ]
Krage, Ralf [2 ]
机构
[1] Herlev Hosp, DIMS, Capital Reg Denmark, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, ADAM Simulat Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
debriefing; psychology; safety; simulation; HEALTH-CARE; NONTECHNICAL SKILLS; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; TEAM PERFORMANCE; FIDELITY; INTERVIEW; SETTINGS; FEEDBACK; ERROR; PART;
D O I
10.1097/ACO.0000000000000018
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Purpose of reviewPsychology is relevant for improving the use of simulation in anesthesiology, as it allows us to describe, explain and optimize the interactions of learners and instructors as well as the design of simulation scenarios and debriefings. Much psychological expertise is not used for simulation in healthcare. This article aims to help bridging the gap between professions.Recent findingsThe evidence is building that simulation is effective for learning. Recent psychological work improves the understanding of why this is the case - or why not. Publications range from the elements to be simulated, to optimizing the presentation of scenarios and debriefings to an organizational overview of how simulation can contribute to patient safety, healthcare worker well-beings and quality of care. The psychological analysis helps in capturing the salient characteristics of the tasks to be simulated and in implementing them in a relevant learning setting.SummaryUsing psychology in simulation allows us to create, recognize and use learning opportunities. The motivations of those involved can be taken into account and the simulation activity can be channeled into a goal-oriented direction.Video abstract availableSee the Video Supplementary Digital Content 1 (http://links.lww.com/COAN/A26).
引用
收藏
页码:714 / 720
页数:7
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CHARTING COURSE
[2]  
[Anonymous], THINKING FAST SLOW
[3]  
[Anonymous], SIMULATION FIDELITY
[4]  
[Anonymous], HEALTHCARE HURTS DOC
[5]   Objective Structured Assessment of Debriefing Bringing Science to the Art of Debriefing in Surgery [J].
Arora, Sonal ;
Ahmed, Maria ;
Paige, John ;
Nestel, Debra ;
Runnacles, Jane ;
Hull, Louise ;
Darzi, Ara ;
Sevdalis, Nick .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 256 (06) :982-988
[6]  
Berne E., 1996, GAMES PEOPLE PLAY
[7]   Within-Team Debriefing Versus Instructor-Led Debriefing for Simulation-Based Education A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Boet, Sylvain ;
Bould, M. Dylan ;
Sharma, Bharat ;
Revees, Scott ;
Naik, Viren N. ;
Triby, Emmanuel ;
Grantcharov, Teodor .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 258 (01) :53-58
[8]   Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare Development and Psychometric Properties [J].
Brett-Fleegler, Marisa ;
Rudolph, Jenny ;
Eppich, Walter ;
Monuteaux, Michael ;
Fleegler, Eric ;
Cheng, Adam ;
Simon, Robert .
SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2012, 7 (05) :288-294
[9]   Coordinating Progressive Levels of Simulation Fidelity to Maximize Educational Benefit [J].
Brydges, Ryan ;
Carnahan, Heather ;
Rose, Don ;
Rose, Louise ;
Dubrowski, Adam .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2010, 85 (05) :806-812
[10]   Interactions of Team Mental Models and Monitoring Behaviors Predict Team Performance in Simulated Anesthesia Inductions [J].
Burtscher, Michael J. ;
Kolbe, Michaela ;
Wacker, Johannes ;
Manser, Tanja .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 2011, 17 (03) :257-269