Predicting Treatment Response of Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using Ultrasound-Guided Diffuse Optical Tomography

被引:21
作者
Zhi, Wenxiang [1 ]
Liu, Guangyu [2 ]
Chang, Cai [1 ]
Miao, Aiyu [1 ]
Zhu, Xiaoli [3 ]
Xie, Li [4 ]
Zhou, Jin [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Dept Ultrasonog,Dept Oncol, 270 Dongan Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Dept Breast Surg,Dept Oncol, 270 Dongan Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol,Dept Oncol, 270 Dongan Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[4] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Clin Stat Ctr,Dept Oncol, 270 Dongan Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
来源
TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY | 2018年 / 11卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
TUMOR RESPONSE; WOMEN; SPECTROSCOPY; MRI; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.tranon.2017.10.011
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To prospectively investigate ultrasound-guided diffuse optical tomography (US-guided DOT) in predicting breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-eight breast cancer patients, with a total of 93 lesions, were included in our study. Pre- and post-last chemotherapy, size and total hemoglobin concentration (THC) of each lesion were measured by conventional US and US-guided DOT 1 day before biopsy (time point t0, THC THC0, SIZE S0) and 1 to 2 days before surgery (time point tL, THCL, SL). The relative changes in THC and SIZE of lesions after the first and last NAC cycles were considered as the variables Delta THC and Delta SIZE. Receiver operating characteristic curve was performed to calculate Delta THC and Delta SIZE cutoff values to evaluate pathologic response of 93 breast cancers to NAC, which were then prospectively used to predicate response of 61 breast cancers to NAC. RESULTS: The cutoff values of Delta THC and Delta SIZE for evaluation of breast cancers NAC treatment response were 23.9% and 42.6%. At Delta THC 23.9%, the predicted treatment response in 61 breast lesions for the time points t1 to t3 was calculated by area under the curve (AUC), which were AUC(1) 0.534 (P = .6668), AUC(2) 0.604 (P = .1893), and AUC(3) 0.674(P = . 0.027), respectively; for Delta SIZE 42.6%, at time points t1 to t3, AUC(1) 0.505 (P = .9121), AUC(2) 0.645 (P = .0115), and AUC(3) 0.719 (P = .0018). CONCLUSION: US-guided DOT Delta THC 23.9% and US Delta SIZE 42.6% can be used for the response evaluation and earlier prediction of the pathological response after three rounds of chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 64
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Treatment Response Evaluation of Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Usefulness of the Imaging Parameters of MRI and PET/CT [J].
An, Yeong Yi ;
Kim, Sung Hun ;
Kang, Bong Joo ;
Lee, Ah Won .
JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 30 (06) :808-815
[2]   Optical malignancy parameters for monitoring progression of breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy [J].
Busch, David R. ;
Choe, Regine ;
Rosen, Mark A. ;
Guo, Wensheng ;
Durduran, Turgut ;
Feldman, Michael D. ;
Mies, Carolyn ;
Czerniecki, Brian J. ;
Tchou, Julia ;
DeMichele, Angela ;
Schnall, Mitchell D. ;
Yodh, Arjun G. .
BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS, 2013, 4 (01) :105-121
[3]   Predicting response to breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy using diffuse optical spectroscopy [J].
Cerussi, Albert ;
Hsiang, David ;
Shah, Natasha ;
Mehta, Rita ;
Durkin, Amanda ;
Butler, John ;
Tromberg, Bruce J. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2007, 104 (10) :4014-4019
[4]   US-GUIDED OPTICAL TOMOGRAPHY: CORRELATION WITH CLINICOPATHOLOGIC VARIABLES IN BREAST CANCER [J].
Choi, Ji Soo ;
Kim, Min Jung ;
Youk, Ji Hyun ;
Moon, Hee Jung ;
Suh, Hee Jung ;
Kim, Eun-Kyung .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 39 (02) :233-240
[5]   New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J].
Eisenhauer, E. A. ;
Therasse, P. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Schwartz, L. H. ;
Sargent, D. ;
Ford, R. ;
Dancey, J. ;
Arbuck, S. ;
Gwyther, S. ;
Mooney, M. ;
Rubinstein, L. ;
Shankar, L. ;
Dodd, L. ;
Kaplan, R. ;
Lacombe, D. ;
Verweij, J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) :228-247
[6]   Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy Evaluation of Treatment Response in Women with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy [J].
Falou, Omar ;
Soliman, Hany ;
Sadeghi-Naini, Ali ;
Iradji, Sara ;
Lemon-Wong, Sharon ;
Zubovits, Judit ;
Spayne, Jacqueline ;
Dent, Rebecca ;
Trudeau, Maureen ;
Boileau, Jean Francois ;
Wright, Frances C. ;
Yaffe, Martin J. ;
Czarnota, Gregory J. .
TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 5 (04) :238-246
[7]   Dynamic optical breast imaging: A novel technique to detect and characterize tumor vessels [J].
Fournier, Laure S. ;
Vanel, Daniel ;
Athanasiou, Alexandra ;
Gatzemeier, Wolfgang ;
Masuykov, I. V. ;
Padhani, Anwar R. ;
Dromain, Clarisse ;
Galetti, Ken ;
Sigal, Robert ;
Costa, Alberto ;
Balleyguier, Corinne .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 69 (01) :43-49
[8]   Understanding the Warburg Effect: The Metabolic Requirements of Cell Proliferation [J].
Heiden, Matthew G. Vander ;
Cantley, Lewis C. ;
Thompson, Craig B. .
SCIENCE, 2009, 324 (5930) :1029-1033
[9]  
JEMAL A, 2011, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V61, P134, DOI [DOI 10.3322/caac.20115, DOI 10.3322/CAAC.20107]
[10]   Predicting Breast Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Diffuse Optical Spectroscopic Tomography prior to Treatment [J].
Jiang, Shudong ;
Pogue, Brian W. ;
Kaufman, Peter A. ;
Gui, Jiang ;
Jermyn, Michael ;
Frazee, Tracy E. ;
Poplack, Steven P. ;
DiFlorio-Alexander, Roberta ;
Wells, Wendy A. ;
Paulsen, Keith D. .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 20 (23) :6006-6015