Triple Collocation-Based Assessment of Satellite Soil Moisture Products with In Situ Measurements in China: Understanding the Error Sources

被引:23
作者
Wu, Xiaotao [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Guihua [1 ]
Wu, Zhiyong [1 ]
He, Hai [1 ]
Scanlon, Tracy [2 ]
Dorigo, Wouter [2 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Coll Hydrol & Water Resources, 1 Xikang Rd, Nanjing 210098, Peoples R China
[2] Vienna Univ Technol, Dept Geodesy & Geoinformat, Wiedner Hauptstr 8-E120, A-1040 Vienna, Austria
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
SMAP; ESA CCI; SMOS; VIC; irrigation impact; LAND DATA ASSIMILATION; IRRIGATED AREAS; AMSR-E; L-BAND; SMOS; VALIDATION; RETRIEVALS; MODEL; PRECIPITATION; DROUGHT;
D O I
10.3390/rs12142275
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the increasing utilization of satellite-based soil moisture products, a primary challenge is knowing their accuracy and robustness. This study presents a comprehensive assessment over China of three widely used global satellite soil moisture products, i.e., Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP), European Space Agency (ESA) Climate Change Initiative (CCI) Soil Moisture, Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS). In situ soil moisture from 1682 stations and Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model are used to evaluate the performance of SMAP_L3, ESA_CCI_SM_COMBINED, SMOS_CATDS_L3 from 31 March 2015 to 3 June 2018. The Triple Collocation (TC) approach is used to minimize the uncertainty (e.g., scale issue) during the validation process. The TC analysis is conducted using three triplets, i.e., [SMAP-Insitu-VIC], [CCI-Insitu-VIC], [SMOS-Insitu-VIC]. In general, SMAP is the most reliable product, reflecting the main spatiotemporal characteristics of soil moisture, while SMOS has the lowest accuracy. The results demonstrate that the overall root mean square error of SMAP, CCI, SMOS is 0.040, 0.028, 0.107 m(3)m(-3), respectively. The overall temporal correlation coefficient of SMAP, CCI, SMOS is 0.68, 0.65, 0.38, respectively. The overall fractional root mean square error of SMAP, CCI, SMOS is 0.707, 0.750, 0.897, respectively. In irrigated areas, the accuracy of CCI is reduced due to the land surface model (which does not consider irrigation) used for the rescaling of the CCI_COMBINED soil moisture product during the merging process, while SMAP and SMOS preserve the irrigation signal. The quality of SMOS is most strongly impacted by land surface temperature, vegetation, and soil texture, while the quality of CCI is the least affected by these factors. With the increase of Radio Frequency Interference, the accuracy of SMOS decreases dramatically, followed by SMAP and CCI. Higher representativeness error of in situ stations is noted in regions with higher topographic complexity. This study helps to provide a guideline for the application of satellite soil moisture products in scientific research and gives some references (e.g., modify data algorithm according to the main error sources) for improving the data quality.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [31] Error Characterization of Significant Wave Heights in Multidecadal Satellite Altimeter Product, Model Hindcast, and In Situ Measurements Using the Triple Collocation Technique
    Dodet, Guillaume
    Abdalla, Saleh
    Alday, Matias
    Accensi, Mickael
    Bidlot, Jean
    Ardhuin, Fabrice
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 39 (07) : 887 - 901
  • [32] Triple Collocation of Ground-, Satellite- and Land Surface Model-Based Surface Soil Moisture Products in Oklahoma Part II: New Multi-Sensor Soil Moisture (MSSM) Product
    Hong, Zhen
    Moreno, Hernan A.
    Alvarez, Laura V.
    Li, Zhi
    Hong, Yang
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (13)
  • [33] True global error maps for SMAP, SMOS, and ASCAT soil moisture data based on machine learning and triple collocation analysis
    Kim, Hyunglok
    Crow, Wade
    Li, Xiaojun
    Wagner, Wolfgang
    Hahn, Sebastian
    Lakshmi, Venkataraman
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 298
  • [34] An assessment of SMOS version 6.20 products through Triple and Quadruple Collocation techniques considering ASCAT, ERA/Interim LAND, ISMN and SMAP soil moisture data
    Fascetti, F.
    Pierdicca, N.
    Crapolicchio, R.
    Pulvirenti, L.
    Muoz-Sabater, J.
    2016 14TH SPECIALIST MEETING ON MICROWAVE RADIOMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING OF THE ENVIRONMENT (MICRORAD), 2016, : 91 - 94
  • [35] Assessment of SMOS and SMAP soil moisture products against new estimates combining physical model, a statistical model, and in-situ observations: A case study over the Huai River Basin, China
    Wang, Xiaoyi
    Lu, Haishen
    Crow, Wade T.
    Zhu, Yonghua
    Wang, Qimeng
    Su, Jianbin
    Zheng, Jingyao
    Gou, Qiqi
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2021, 598
  • [36] Quality Improvement of Satellite Soil Moisture Products by Fusing with In-Situ Measurements and GNSS-R Estimates in the Western Continental US
    Xu, Hongzhang
    Yuan, Qiangqiang
    Li, Tongwen
    Shen, Huanfeng
    Zhang, Liangpei
    Jiang, Hongtao
    REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (09)
  • [37] Preliminary validation of two temporal parameter-based soil moisture retrieval models using a satellite product and in situ soil moisture measurements over the REMEDHUS network
    Leng, Pei
    Song, Xiaoning
    Duan, Si-Bo
    Li, Zhao-Liang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 37 (24) : 5902 - 5917
  • [38] Cross-evaluation of ground-based, multi-satellite and reanalysis precipitation products: Applicability of the Triple Collocation method across Mainland China
    Li, Changming
    Tang, Guoqiang
    Hong, Yang
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2018, 562 : 71 - 83
  • [39] Comparison of the performance of latent heat flux products over southern hemisphere forest ecosystems: estimating latent heat flux error structure using in situ measurements and the triple collocation method
    Barraza Bernadas, Veronica
    Grings, Francisco
    Restrepo-Coupe, Natalia
    Huete, Alfredo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 39 (19) : 6300 - 6315
  • [40] ASSESSMENT OF QP MODEL BASED TWO CHANNEL ALGORITHM WITH JAXA, LPRM SOIL MOISTURE PRODUCTS OVER GENHE AREA IN CHINA
    Cui, Huizhen
    Jiang, Lingmei
    Du, Jinyang
    Wang, Gongxue
    Lu, Zheng
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2016, : 1663 - 1666