Triple Collocation-Based Assessment of Satellite Soil Moisture Products with In Situ Measurements in China: Understanding the Error Sources

被引:23
|
作者
Wu, Xiaotao [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Guihua [1 ]
Wu, Zhiyong [1 ]
He, Hai [1 ]
Scanlon, Tracy [2 ]
Dorigo, Wouter [2 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Coll Hydrol & Water Resources, 1 Xikang Rd, Nanjing 210098, Peoples R China
[2] Vienna Univ Technol, Dept Geodesy & Geoinformat, Wiedner Hauptstr 8-E120, A-1040 Vienna, Austria
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
SMAP; ESA CCI; SMOS; VIC; irrigation impact; LAND DATA ASSIMILATION; IRRIGATED AREAS; AMSR-E; L-BAND; SMOS; VALIDATION; RETRIEVALS; MODEL; PRECIPITATION; DROUGHT;
D O I
10.3390/rs12142275
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the increasing utilization of satellite-based soil moisture products, a primary challenge is knowing their accuracy and robustness. This study presents a comprehensive assessment over China of three widely used global satellite soil moisture products, i.e., Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP), European Space Agency (ESA) Climate Change Initiative (CCI) Soil Moisture, Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS). In situ soil moisture from 1682 stations and Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model are used to evaluate the performance of SMAP_L3, ESA_CCI_SM_COMBINED, SMOS_CATDS_L3 from 31 March 2015 to 3 June 2018. The Triple Collocation (TC) approach is used to minimize the uncertainty (e.g., scale issue) during the validation process. The TC analysis is conducted using three triplets, i.e., [SMAP-Insitu-VIC], [CCI-Insitu-VIC], [SMOS-Insitu-VIC]. In general, SMAP is the most reliable product, reflecting the main spatiotemporal characteristics of soil moisture, while SMOS has the lowest accuracy. The results demonstrate that the overall root mean square error of SMAP, CCI, SMOS is 0.040, 0.028, 0.107 m(3)m(-3), respectively. The overall temporal correlation coefficient of SMAP, CCI, SMOS is 0.68, 0.65, 0.38, respectively. The overall fractional root mean square error of SMAP, CCI, SMOS is 0.707, 0.750, 0.897, respectively. In irrigated areas, the accuracy of CCI is reduced due to the land surface model (which does not consider irrigation) used for the rescaling of the CCI_COMBINED soil moisture product during the merging process, while SMAP and SMOS preserve the irrigation signal. The quality of SMOS is most strongly impacted by land surface temperature, vegetation, and soil texture, while the quality of CCI is the least affected by these factors. With the increase of Radio Frequency Interference, the accuracy of SMOS decreases dramatically, followed by SMAP and CCI. Higher representativeness error of in situ stations is noted in regions with higher topographic complexity. This study helps to provide a guideline for the application of satellite soil moisture products in scientific research and gives some references (e.g., modify data algorithm according to the main error sources) for improving the data quality.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [21] Evaluation of 18 satellite- and model-based soil moisture products using in situ measurements from 826 sensors
    Beck, Hylke E.
    Pan, Ming
    Miralles, Diego G.
    Reichle, Rolf H.
    Dorigo, Wouter A.
    Hahn, Sebastian
    Sheffield, Justin
    Karthikeyan, Lanka
    Balsamo, Gianpaolo
    Parinussa, Robert M.
    van Dijk, Albert I. J. M.
    Du, Jinyang
    Kimball, John S.
    Vergopolan, Noemi
    Wood, Eric F.
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2021, 25 (01) : 17 - 40
  • [22] Error Decomposition of Remote Sensing Soil Moisture Products Based on the Triple-Collocation Method Introducing an Unbiased Reference Dataset: A Case Study on the Tibetan Plateau
    Kang, Jian
    Jin, Rui
    Li, Xin
    Zhang, Yang
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (18)
  • [23] Assessment of five SMAP soil moisture products using ISMN ground-based measurements over varied environmental conditions
    Yi, Chuanxiang
    Li, Xiaojun
    Zeng, Jiangyuan
    Fan, Lei
    Xie, Zhiqing
    Gao, Lun
    Xing, Zanpin
    Ma, Hongliang
    Boudah, Antoine
    Zhou, Hongwei
    Zhou, Wenjun
    Sheng, Ye
    Dong, Tianxiang
    Wigneron, Jean-Pierre
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2023, 619
  • [24] Validation of Four Satellite-Derived Soil Moisture Products Using Ground-Based In Situ Observations over Northern China
    Liu, Weicheng
    Wang, Jixin
    Xu, Falei
    Li, Chenrui
    Xian, Tao
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (06)
  • [25] Improving the Combination of Satellite Soil Moisture Data Sets by Considering Error Cross Correlation: A Comparison Between Triple Collocation (TC) and Extended Double Instrumental Variable (EIVD) Alternatives
    Kim, Seokhyeon
    Pham, Hung T.
    Liu, Yi Y.
    Marshall, Lucy
    Sharma, Ashish
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 59 (09): : 7285 - 7295
  • [26] Evaluation of Multiple Satellite-Based Soil Moisture Products over Continental U.S. Based on In Situ Measurements
    Wenlong Jing
    Jia Song
    Xiaodan Zhao
    Water Resources Management, 2018, 32 : 3233 - 3246
  • [27] Comprehensive quality assessment of satellite- and model-based soil moisture products against the COSMOS network in Germany
    Schmidt, Toni
    Schroen, Martin
    Li, Zhan
    Francke, Till
    Zacharias, Steffen
    Hildebrandt, Anke
    Peng, Jian
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 301
  • [28] A Hybrid Triple Collocation-Deep Learning Approach for Improving Soil Moisture Estimation from Satellite and Model-Based Data
    Ming, Wenting
    Ji, Xuan
    Zhang, Mingda
    Li, Yungang
    Liu, Chang
    Wang, Yinfei
    Li, Jiqiu
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (07)
  • [29] An in-situ data based model to downscale radiometric satellite soil moisture products in the Upper Hunter Region of NSW, Australia
    Senanayake, I. P.
    Yeo, I-Y
    Tangdamrongsub, N.
    Willgoose, G. R.
    Hancock, G. R.
    Welis, T.
    Fang, B.
    Lakshmi, V
    Walker, J. P.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2019, 572 : 820 - 838
  • [30] Evaluating Root-Zone Soil Moisture Products from GLEAM, GLDAS, and ERA5 Based on In Situ Observations and Triple Collocation Method over the Tibetan Plateau
    Yang, Siqi
    Zeng, Jiangyuan
    Fan, Wenjie
    Cui, Yaokui
    JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2022, 23 (12) : 1861 - 1878