No cash, no care: how user fees endanger health-lessons learnt regarding financial barriers to healthcare services in Burundi, Sierra Leone, Democratic Republic of Congo, Chad, Haiti and Mali

被引:35
作者
Ponsar, Frederique [2 ]
Tayler-Smith, Katie [1 ]
Philips, Mit [2 ]
Gerard, Seco [2 ]
Van Herp, Michel [3 ]
Reid, Tony [1 ]
Zachariah, Rony [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Sans Frontieres, Operat Res Unit, Dept Med, Operat Ctr Brussels, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Med Sans Frontieres, Anal & Advocacy Unit, Operat Ctr Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Med Sans Frontieres, Epidemiol Unit, Dept Med, Operat Ctr Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
来源
INTERNATIONAL HEALTH | 2011年 / 3卷 / 02期
关键词
User fees; Healthcare access; Health service utilisation; Impoverishment; SECTOR REFORMS; LOW-INCOME; IMPACT; COUNTRIES; DISTRICT; AFRICA; EQUITY; ACCESS; KENYA;
D O I
10.1016/j.inhe.2011.01.002
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Although user fees are a common form of healthcare financing in resource-poor countries, there is growing consensus that their use compromises health service utilisation and population health. Between 2003 and 2006, Medecins sans Frontieres (MSF) conducted population-based surveys in Burundi, Sierra Leone, Democratic Republic of Congo, Chad, Haiti and Mali to determine the impact of user fees on healthcare-seeking behaviour and access. For general and disease-specific conditions, MSF also measured the impact of (i) reduced payment systems in Chad, Mali, Haiti and Burundi and (ii) user fee abolition for certain population groups in Burundi and Mali. User fees were found to result in low utilisation of public health facilities, exclusion from health care and exacerbation of impoverishment, forcing many to seek alternative care. Financial barriers affected 30-60% of people requiring health care. Exemption systems targeting vulnerable individuals proved ineffective, benefiting only 1-3.5% of populations. Alternative payment systems, requiring 'modest' fees from users (e.g. low flat fees), did not adequately improve coverage of essential health needs, especially for the poorest and most vulnerable. Conversely, user fee abolition for large population groups led to rapid increases in utilisation of health services and coverage of essential healthcare needs. Abolition of user fees appears crucial in helping to reduce existing barriers to health care. The challenge for health authorities and donor agencies is around working creatively to remove the fees while addressing the financial consequences of improved access and providing quality care. (C) 2011 Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 100
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ACCESS HEALTHCARE MO
[2]  
Ardeshir Sepehri Ardeshir Sepehri, 2001, Journal of International Development, V13, P183, DOI 10.1002/jid.726
[3]  
Burnham GM, 2004, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V82, P187
[4]  
Cetinoglu D, 2004, ACCESS HLTH CARE BUR
[5]  
Checci F, 2005, 52 OV DEV I HUM PRAC
[6]   Reducing user fees for primary health care in Kenya: Policy on paper or policy in practice? [J].
Chuma, Jane ;
Musimbi, Janet ;
Okungu, Vincent ;
Goodman, Catherine ;
Molyneux, Catherine .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2009, 8
[7]   The fall and rise of cost sharing in Kenya: The impact of phased implementation [J].
Collins, D ;
Quick, JD ;
Musau, SN ;
Kraushaar, D ;
Hussein, IM .
HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 1996, 11 (01) :52-63
[8]   Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: how many newborn babies can we save? [J].
Darmstadt, GL ;
Bhutta, ZA ;
Cousens, S ;
Adam, T ;
Walker, N ;
de Bernis, L .
LANCET, 2005, 365 (9463) :977-988
[9]  
Enyeque A, 2006, ACCES SOINS SANTE PR
[10]  
Frieden M, 2005, ACCES SOINS SANTE AC