Comparison of 192Ir air kerma calibration coefficients derived at ARPANSA using the interpolation method and at the National Physical Laboratory using a direct measurement

被引:14
作者
Butler, D. [1 ]
Haworth, A. [2 ,3 ]
Sander, T. [4 ]
Todd, S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Australian Radiat Protect & Nucl Safety Agcy, Yallambie, Vic, Australia
[2] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] RMIT Univ, Sch Appl Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Natl Phys Lab, Teddington TW11 0LW, Middx, England
关键词
Ir-192; HDR brachytherapy; dosimetry; comparison;
D O I
10.1007/BF03178603
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The reference air kerma rate from Ir-192 High Dose Rate (HDR) brachytherapy sources can be measured using a suitably calibrated Fanner chamber and an appropriate in-air calibration jig. When a primary standard for Ir-192 gamma rays is available, a calibration coefficient for the chamber and jig combination can be determined directly. In Australia, due to the absence of such a standard, the chamber must be calibrated by interpolation of the response in Co-60 and in a kilovoltage x-ray beam. Corrections for the effect of the jig, scatter and beam non-uniformity must then be measured or calculated before the reference air kerma rate can be determined. We compare the air-kerma calibration coefficient of a PTW 30010 PMMA/Al Fanner chamber (referred to as Farmer chamber throughout this report) obtained from the Ir-192 primary standard at the National Physical Laboratory in the UK with the corresponding coefficient obtained by interpolating Australian calibrations using Co-60 and 250 kV x-rays and determining suitable correction factors. The resulting chamber/jig calibration coefficients differ by 0.2% which is well within the combined standard uncertainties of 1.2% and 0.6% reported by ARPANSA and NPL respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:332 / 338
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, IAEATECDOC1274
[2]   CORRECTION FACTORS FOR THICK-WALLED IONIZATION CHAMBERS IN POINT-SOURCE PHOTON BEAMS [J].
BIELAJEW, AF .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1990, 35 (04) :501-516
[3]  
Borg J., 1998, PIRS629R NRC, DOI DOI 10.4224/5764262
[4]   Monte Carlo calculations of the ionization chamber wall correction factors for 192Ir and 60Co gamma rays and 250 kV x-rays for use in calibration of 192Ir HDR brachytherapy sources [J].
Ferreira, IH ;
de Almeida, CE ;
Marre, D ;
Marechal, MH ;
Bridier, A ;
Chavaudra, J .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1999, 44 (08) :1897-1904
[5]   CALIBRATION OF IR-192 HIGH-DOSE-RATE AFTERLOADING SYSTEMS [J].
GOETSCH, SJ ;
ATTIX, FH ;
PEARSON, DW ;
THOMADSEN, BR .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1991, 18 (03) :462-467
[6]  
LOEVINGER R, 1956, RAD DOSIMETRY, P755
[7]   On the accuracy of techniques for obtaining the calibration coefficient NK of 192Ir HDR brachytherapy sources [J].
Mainegra-Hing, Ernesto ;
Rogers, D. W. O. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (09) :3340-3347
[8]   Experimental derivation of wall correction factors for ionization chambers used in high dose rate 192Ir source calibration [J].
Maréchal, MH ;
de Almeida, CE ;
Ferreira, IH ;
Sibata, CH .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (01) :1-5
[9]  
MARECHAL MH, 1996, RAD DOSE PRESCRIPTIO, P203
[10]   Applications of the Italian protocol for the calibration of brachytherapy sources [J].
Piermattei, A ;
Azario, L .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1997, 42 (08) :1661-1669