Evaluating the primary-to-specialist referral system for elective hip and knee arthroplasty

被引:18
作者
Fyie, Ken [1 ,2 ]
Frank, Cy [3 ,4 ]
Noseworthy, Tom [5 ]
Christiansen, Tanya [4 ]
Marshall, Deborah A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Dept Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Surg, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Alberta Bone & Joint Hlth Inst, Calgary, AB, Canada
[5] Univ Calgary, Alberta Bone & Joint Hlth Inst, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
hip and knee arthroplasty; quality of health care; referral and consultation; waiting lists; waiting times; WAITING-TIMES; REPLACEMENT; OSTEOARTHRITIS; COMMUNICATION; MODEL; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/jep.12080
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Rationale, aims and objectivesPersistently long waiting times for hip and knee total joint arthroplasty (TJA) specialist consultations have been identified as a problem. This study described referral processes and practices, and their impact on the waiting time from referral to consultation for TJA. MethodsA mixed-methods retrospective study incorporating semi-structured interviews, patient chart reviews and observational studies was conducted at three clinic sites in Alberta, Canada. A total of 218 charts were selected for analysis. Standardized definitions were applied to key event dates. Performance measures included waiting times percentage of referrals initially accepted. Voluntary (patient-related) and involuntary (health system-related) waiting times were quantified. ResultsAll three clinics had defined, but differing, referral processing rules. The mean time from referral to consultation ranged from 51 to 139 business days. Choosing a specific surgeon for consultation rather than a next available surgeon lengthened waits by 10-47 business days. Involuntary waiting times accounted for at least 11% of total waiting time. Approximately 40-80% of the time patients with TJA wait for surgery was in the consultation period. Fifty-four per cent of new referrals were initially rejected, prolonging patient waits by 8-46 business days. ConclusionsOur results suggest that variation in referral processing led to increased waiting times for patients. The large proportion of total wait attributable to waiting for a surgical consultation makes failure to measure and evaluate this period a significant omission. Improving referral processes and decreasing variation between clinics would improve patient access to these specialist referrals in Alberta.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 73
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Alberta Bone & Joint Health Institute, 2007, Alberta Hip and Knee Replacement Pilot Project: Scientific Evaluation Report
[2]  
Alberta Health Services, 2010, BEC BEST ALB 5 YEAR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, ENV NAT HLTH CAR QUA
[4]  
[Anonymous], OST NAT CLIN GUID CA
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, IMP ARTHR CAN TOD NE
[6]  
[Anonymous], ALB QUAL MATR HLTH U
[7]   'There are too many of us to fix.' Patients' views of acceptable waiting times for hip and knee replacement [J].
Conner-Spady, Barbara ;
Sanmartin, Claudia ;
Johnston, Geoffrey ;
McGurran, John ;
Kehler, Melissa ;
Noseworthy, Tom .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & POLICY, 2009, 14 (04) :212-218
[8]   STUDY OF 500 PATIENTS WITH LIMB JOINT OSTEOARTHRITIS .1. ANALYSIS BY AGE, SEX, AND DISTRIBUTION OF SYMPTOMATIC JOINT SITES [J].
CUSHNAGHAN, J ;
DIEPPE, P .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1991, 50 (01) :8-13
[9]   Is patient choice an effective mechanism to reduce waiting times? [J].
Diane Dawson ;
Rowena Jacobs ;
Steve Martin ;
Peter Smith .
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2004, 3 (4) :195-203
[10]   Validation of a prioritization tool for patients on the waiting list for total hip and knee replacements [J].
Escobar, Antonio ;
Gonzalez, Marta ;
Quintana, Jose M. ;
Bilbao, Amaia ;
Ibanez, Berta .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2009, 15 (01) :97-102