An Epistemological Theory of Argumentation for Adversarial Legal Proceedings

被引：0
|
作者：
Marrero, Danny [1 ]
机构：
[1] Off Attorney Gen, Dept Adv Studies, Carrera 13 73-50, Bogota, Colombia
来源：
INFORMAL LOGIC | 2016年 / 36卷 / 03期
关键词：
adversarial criminal proceedings; epistemological approach to argumentation; extreme adversarialism; factual legal argumentation; knowledge attributions; rhetorical approach to argumentation; strict invariantism;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
B81 [逻辑学（论理学）];
学科分类号：
010104 ; 010105 ;
摘要：
The rhetorical view (R) suggests that the goal of factual argumentation in legal proceedings is to persuade the fact-finder about the facts under litigation. However, R does not capture our social expectations: we want fact-finders to know the facts justifying their decisions, and persuasion does not necessarily lead to knowledge. I want to present an epistemic theory of argumentation honoring our expectations. Under my account, factual argumentation aims to transmit knowledge to the fact-finder.
引用
收藏
页码：288 / 308
页数：21
相关论文
共 50 条
12345