An Epistemological Theory of Argumentation for Adversarial Legal Proceedings

被引：0
|
作者：
Marrero, Danny [1 ]
机构：
[1] Off Attorney Gen, Dept Adv Studies, Carrera 13 73-50, Bogota, Colombia
来源：
INFORMAL LOGIC | 2016年 / 36卷 / 03期
关键词：
adversarial criminal proceedings; epistemological approach to argumentation; extreme adversarialism; factual legal argumentation; knowledge attributions; rhetorical approach to argumentation; strict invariantism;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
B81 [逻辑学（论理学）];
学科分类号：
010104 ; 010105 ;
摘要：
The rhetorical view (R) suggests that the goal of factual argumentation in legal proceedings is to persuade the fact-finder about the facts under litigation. However, R does not capture our social expectations: we want fact-finders to know the facts justifying their decisions, and persuasion does not necessarily lead to knowledge. I want to present an epistemic theory of argumentation honoring our expectations. Under my account, factual argumentation aims to transmit knowledge to the fact-finder.
引用
收藏
页码：288 / 308
页数：21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Legal Argumentation Theory
    Pavcnik, Marijan
    ARCHIV FUR RECHTS- UND SOZIALPHILOSOPHIE, 2024, 110 (01): : 146 - 150
  • [2] THEORY OF LEGAL ARGUMENTATION
    Toledo, Claiudia
    VEREDAS DO DIREITO, 2005, 2 (03): : 47 - 65
  • [3] RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN LEGAL ARGUMENTATION THEORY - DIALECTICAL APPROACHES TO LEGAL ARGUMENTATION
    FETERIS, ET
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR THE SEMIOTICS OF LAW-REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE SEMIOTIQUE JURIDIQUE, 1994, 7 (20): : 133 - 153
  • [4] What is the Theory Legal Argumentation For?
    Atienza, Manuel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR THE SEMIOTICS OF LAW-REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE SEMIOTIQUE JURIDIQUE, 2020, 33 (01): : 147 - 153
  • [5] What is the Theory Legal Argumentation For?
    Manuel Atienza
    International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 2020, 33 : 147 - 153
  • [6] The legal argumentation. Theory and practice
    de Prada Garcia, Aurelio
    ANUARIO DE FILOSOFIA DEL DERECHO, 2018, 34 : 463 - 467
  • [7] Justifying the Epistemological Theory of Argumentation: On Harvey Siegel's Approach
    Lumer, Christoph
    INFORMAL LOGIC, 2023, 43 (04): : 574 - 600
  • [8] Law & Literature (as an epistemological break in legal theory)
    Lhuilier, Gilles
    LAW AND HUMANITIES, 2011, 5 (01): : 3 - 9
  • [9] Epistemological problems with the normative theory of legal science
    Guastini, R
    REVUE DE METAPHYSIQUE ET DE MORALE, 1997, (04): : 551 - 563
  • [10] Equality as practice. Theory of legal argumentation
    Vantin, Serena
    IRIDE-FILOSOFIA E DISCUSSIONE PUBBLICA, 2016, 29 (02): : 462 - 465
12345