Salvage reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for failed anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a cohort

被引:10
作者
Otte, R. Stephen [1 ]
Naylor, Amanda J. [2 ]
Blanchard, Kassandra N. [2 ]
Cancienne, Jourdan M. [3 ]
Chan, William [2 ]
Romeo, Anthony A. [4 ]
Garrigues, Grant E. [2 ]
Nicholson, Gregory P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Coastal Orthoped, Bradenton, FL USA
[2] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 1611 W Harrison St,Ste 300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[3] Southern Orthopaed Specialists, New Orleans, LA USA
[4] Rothman Orthopaed, New York, NY USA
关键词
Total shoulder arthroplasty; reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; revision shoulder arthroplasty; patient-reported outcomes; shoulder range of motion; failed shoulder arthroplasty; REVISION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.013
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) as a revision procedure for failed anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is increasing in incidence. The purpose of this study was to analyze the results of RTSA as a revision salvage procedure for failed TSA and identify factors that influenced those outcomes. Methods: All anatomic TSAs that were revised to RTSAs in adult patients, under the care of 2 senior surgeons at a single academic center from 2006 to 2018, were queried and reviewed. Cases in which hemiarthroplasty or RTSA was revised to RTSA were excluded. Electronic medical records and survey databases were reviewed for each subject. Demographic and surgical details were reviewed and analyzed with descriptive statistics. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion (ROM) including active forward elevation and active external rotation were evaluated. Patient-reported outcome surveys including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons survey, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and visual analog scale for pain were collected and analyzed. Improvement in ROM and outcome sur- vey measures was assessed with 2-sample t tests. Complication and reoperation rates were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 75 patients (32 men and 43 women) were available for analysis at a mean of 22.3 months. The subjects were aged 60.3 +/- 11.3 years at the time of TSA and 64.6 +/- 9.7 years at the time of RTSA. The average period between TSA and RTSA was 4.3 years. The 3 most common indications for revision RTSA were painful arthroplasty (n = 62, 82.7%), rotator cuff failure (n = 56, 74.7%), and unstable arthroplasty (n = 25, 33.3%), but the majority of patients had multiple indications for surgery (n = 69, 92%). Significant improvements were found in all outcome measures from the time of failed TSA diagnosis to most recent follow-up after salvage RTSA with the exception of active external rotation: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, 39 +/- 15 preoperatively vs. 62 +/- 25 postoperatively; Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, 27 +/- 23 vs. 60 +/- 30; visual analog scale pain score, 5 +/- 2 vs. 3 +/- 3; and active forward elevation, 79 degrees +/- 41 degrees vs. 128 degrees +/- 33 degrees. Major complications occurred in 21 patients (28.4%) after salvage RTSA, and 9 (12%) underwent reoperation. Conclusions: RTSA for failed TSA can improve pain, function, and quality-of-life measures in patients with various TSA failure eti- ologies. However, postoperative ROM and patient-reported outcomes do not reach the values seen in the primary RTSA population. Level of evidence: Level IV; Case Series; Treatment Study (C) 2020 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:s134 / s138
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Revisions for aseptic glenoid component loosening after anatomic shoulder arthroplasty
    Aibinder, William R.
    Schoch, Bradley
    Schleck, Cathy
    Sperling, John W.
    Cofield, Robert H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2017, 26 (03) : 443 - 449
  • [2] What Are the Complications, Survival, and Outcomes After Revision to Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients Older Than 80 Years?
    Alentorn-Geli, Eduard
    Clark, Nicholas J.
    Assenmacher, Andrew T.
    Samuelsen, Brian T.
    Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin
    Cofield, Robert H.
    Sperling, John W.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 475 (11) : 2744 - 2751
  • [3] Is Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty a Reasonable Alternative for Revision Arthroplasty?
    Austin, Luke
    Zmistowski, Benjamin
    Chang, Edward S.
    Williams, Gerald R., Jr.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (09) : 2531 - 2537
  • [4] Yearly Trends in Elective Shoulder Arthroplasty, 2005-2013
    Dillon, Mark T.
    Chan, Priscilla H.
    Inacio, Maria C. S.
    Singh, Anshuman
    Yian, Edward H.
    Navarro, Ronald A.
    [J]. ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2017, 69 (10) : 1574 - 1581
  • [5] Revision of failed shoulder arthroplasty: epidemiology, etiology, and surgical options
    Gauci, Marc-Olivier
    Cavalier, Maxime
    Gonzalez, Jean-Francois
    Holzer, Nicolas
    Baring, Toby
    Walch, Gilles
    Boileau, Pascal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2020, 29 (03) : 541 - 549
  • [6] Revision to Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Restores Stability for Patients With Unstable Shoulder Prostheses
    Hernandez, Nicholas M.
    Chalmers, Brian P.
    Wagner, Eric R.
    Sperling, John W.
    Cofield, Robert H.
    Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 475 (11) : 2716 - 2722
  • [7] Conversions from anatomic shoulder replacements to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: do the indications for initial surgery influence the clinical outcome after revision surgery?
    Holschen, Malte
    Franetzki, Bastian
    Witt, Kai-Axel
    Liem, Dennis
    Steinbeck, Joern
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2017, 137 (02) : 167 - 172
  • [8] Mid- to long-term follow-up of shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis in patients aged 60 or under
    Neyton, Lionel
    Kirsch, Jacob M.
    Collotte, Philippe
    Collin, Philippe
    Gossing, Louis
    Chelli, Mikael
    Walch, Gilles
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2019, 28 (09) : 1666 - 1673
  • [9] Surgical Treatment Options for Glenohumeral Arthritis in Young Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Sayegh, Eli T.
    Mascarenhas, Randy
    Chalmers, Peter N.
    Cole, Brian J.
    Romeo, Anthony A.
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2015, 31 (06) : 1156 - U430
  • [10] Sheth M, 2019, ARCH BONE JT SURG-AB, V7, P19