The coherence of common policies of the EU in territorial cohesion: A never-ending discourse? A review

被引:11
作者
Mikus, Ornella [1 ]
Kukoc, Marin [2 ]
Rogelj, Mateja Jez [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zagreb, Dept Agr Econ & Rural Dev, Fac Agr, Zagreb, Croatia
[2] Minist Agr Republ Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia
来源
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-ZEMEDELSKA EKONOMIKA | 2019年 / 65卷 / 03期
关键词
coherence; cohesion; Cohesion Policy; Common Agricultural Policy; competitiveness; REGIONAL GROWTH; EUROPEAN-UNION; SOCIAL INCLUSION; COMPETITIVENESS;
D O I
10.17221/229/2018-AGRICECON
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
The measures of Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and Regional (Cohesion) Policy are aimed at achieving cohesion, i.e. reducing the economic (sectoral), social and territorial disparities at European Union level. The issue of rural areas has become an important part of the CAP measures in Pillar 2. Since the CAP does not have a primarily territorial orientation, it does not contribute to territorial cohesion of rural areas. In a similar vein, regional policy, which is primarily oriented towards territorial development, also failed to give rise to complete, balanced development. Using qualitative analysis, this article summarises references selected on the basis of the authors' experience in policy issues. The types of discourse included on the subject of coherence of common policies are the role of agricultural, rural and regional policy in cohesion and the conflict of cohesion and competitiveness objectives. Modern political and economic efforts of converging competitiveness into the macro concept with spatial implication result in planning and implementation of inappropriate measures and instruments intended to encourage the balanced territorial development of the EU. From this arises a conflict of cohesion and competitiveness, coupled with long-term consequences for the most vulnerable areas.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 149
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, CAP REGIONS TERRITOR
[2]   Going NUTS: The effect of EU Structural Funds on regional performance [J].
Becker, Sascha O. ;
Egger, Peter H. ;
von Ehrlich, Maximilian .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2010, 94 (9-10) :578-590
[3]  
Begg I., 2010, European Integration, V32, P77, DOI [10.1080/07036330903375115, DOI 10.1080/07036330903375115]
[4]   Regional growth in Western Europe: detecting spatial misspecification using the R environment [J].
Bivand, Roger ;
Brunstad, Rolf .
PAPERS IN REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2006, 85 (02) :277-297
[5]   Everyone's a 'winner': problematising the discourse of regional competitiveness [J].
Bristow, G .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2005, 5 (03) :285-304
[6]   The impact of EU regional support on growth and convergence in the European Union [J].
Cappelen, A ;
Castellacci, F ;
Fagerberg, J ;
Verspagen, B .
JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2003, 41 (04) :621-644
[7]   In Tandem for Cohesion? Synergies and Conflicts between Regional and Agricultural Policies of the European Union [J].
Crescenzi, Riccardo ;
De Filippis, Fabrizio ;
Pierangeli, Fabio .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2015, 49 (04) :681-704
[8]   Regional growth and policies in the European Union:: Does the common agricultural policy have a counter-treatment effect? [J].
Esposti, Roberto .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 89 (01) :116-134
[9]   Competitiveness, cohesion, and governance: Their implications for social justice [J].
Fainstein, SS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN AND REGIONAL RESEARCH, 2001, 25 (04) :884-888
[10]   Potentials for prosperity without growth: Ecological sustainability, social inclusion and the quality of life in 38 countries [J].
Fritz, Martin ;
Koch, Max .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 108 :191-199