Positive and Negative Corporate Social Responsibility, Financial Leverage, and Idiosyncratic Risk

被引:244
作者
Mishra, Saurabh [1 ]
Modi, Sachin B. [2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Desautels Fac Management, Montreal, PQ H3A 1G5, Canada
[2] Univ Toledo, Coll Business & Innovat, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; Idiosyncratic risk; Secondary data; 3SLS models; BUYER-SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; STAKEHOLDER THEORY; CAPITAL STRUCTURE; SHAREHOLDER VALUE; PERFORMANCE; FIRM; FRAMEWORK; STRATEGY; RETURNS;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-012-1526-9
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Existing research on the financial implications of corporate social responsibility (CSR) for firms has predominantly focused on positive aspects of CSR, overlooking that firms also undertake actions and initiatives that qualify as negative CSR. Moreover, studies in this area have not investigated how both positive and negative CSR affect the financial risk of firms. As such, in this research, the authors provide a framework linking both positive and negative CSR to idiosyncratic risk of firms. While investigating these relationships, the authors also analyze the moderating role of financial leverage of firms. Overall, analysis of secondary information for firms from multiple industries over the years 2000-2009 shows that CSR has a significant effect on the idiosyncratic risk of firms, with positive CSR reducing risk and negative CSR increasing it. Results also show that the reduction in risk from positive CSR is not guaranteed, with firms having high levels of financial leverage witnessing lower idiosyncratic risk reduction.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 448
页数:18
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations [J].
Aguilera, Ruth V. ;
Rupp, Deborah E. ;
Williams, Cynthia A. ;
Ganapathi, Jyoti .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (03) :836-863
[2]   The cross-section of volatility and expected returns [J].
Ang, A ;
Hodrick, RJ ;
Xing, YH ;
Zhang, XY .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2006, 61 (01) :259-299
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause
[4]  
[Anonymous], 11017 HARV BUS SCH
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Econometric Analysis, DOI DOI 10.1093/GERONB/GBQ006
[6]  
AUPPERLE KE, 1985, ACAD MANAGE J, V28, P446, DOI 10.5465/256210
[7]   Employee treatment and firm leverage: A test of the stakeholder theory of capital structure [J].
Bae, Kee-Hong ;
Kang, Jun-Koo ;
Wang, Jin .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 100 (01) :130-153
[8]   Buyer-supplier relationships and the stakeholder theory of capital structure [J].
Banerjee, Shantanu ;
Dasgupta, Sudipto ;
Kim, Yungsan .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2008, 63 (05) :2507-2552
[9]   Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment [J].
Bansal, P ;
Clelland, I .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2004, 47 (01) :93-103
[10]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120