In vivo basal ganglia volumetry through application of NURBS models to MR images

被引:20
作者
Anastasi, Giuseppe
Cutroneo, Giuseppina
Tomasello, Francesco
Lucerna, Sebastiano
Vitetta, AntonGiulio
Bramanti, Placido
Di Bella, Paolo
Parenti, Anna
Porzionato, Andrea
Macchi, Veronica
De Caro, Raffaele
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Human Anat & Physiol, Sect Anat, I-35127 Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Padua, Dept Surg & Oncol Sci, Sect Pathol Anat, Padua, Italy
[3] Univ Messina, Study & Treatment Ctr Long Stay Neurol Patients, Neuroradiol Sect, Messina, Italy
[4] Univ Messina, Dept Neurosurg, Messina, Italy
[5] Univ Messina, Dept Biomorphol & Biotechnol, Messina, Italy
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; caudate nucleus; putamen; globus pallidus;
D O I
10.1007/s00234-005-0041-4
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Volumetry of basal ganglia (BG) based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides a sensitive marker in differential diagnosis of BG disorders. The non-uniform rational B-spline (NURBS) surfaces are mathematical representations of three-dimensional structures which have recently been applied in volumetric studies. In this study, a volumetric evaluation of BG based on NURBS was performed in 35 right-handed volunteers. We aimed to compare and validate this technique with respect to manual MRI volumetry and evaluate possible side differences between these structures. Intra- and interobserver biases less than 1.5% demonstrated the method's stability. The mean percentage differences between NURBS and manual methods were less than 1% for all the structures considered; however, the internal segments of the globus pallidus showed a mean percentage difference of about 1.7%. Rightward asymmetry was found for the caudate nucleus ( mean +/- SD 3.20 +/- 0.20 cm(3) vs. 3.10 +/- 0.19 cm(3), P< 0.001) for both its head (1.44 +/- 0.10 cm(3) vs. 1.41 +/- 0.09 cm(3), P< 0.01) and its body/tail (1.73 +/- 0.11 cm(3) and 1.68 +/- 0.12 cm(3), P< 0.01), and for the globus pallidus (1.23 +/- 0.08 cm(3) and 1.18 +/- 0.09 cm(3), P< 0.001) for both the internal (0.33 +/- 0.05 cm(3) vs. 0.31 +/- 0.05 cm(3), P< 0.01) and external (0.90 +/- 0.05 cm(3) vs. 0.86 +/- 0.05 cm(3), P< 0.001) segments. No volumetric side differences were found for the putamen (3.43 +/- 0.14 cm(3) vs. 3.39 +/- 0.17 cm(3), P> 0.05). The rightward asymmetry of the BG may be ascribed to the predominant use of the right hand. In conclusion, NURBS is an accurate and reliable method for quantitative volumetry of nervous structures. It offers the advantage of giving a three-dimensional representation of the structures examined.
引用
收藏
页码:338 / 345
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1990, The Human Nervous System
  • [2] Basal ganglia volume and proximity to onset in presymptomatic Huntington disease
    Aylward, EH
    Codori, AM
    Barta, PE
    Pearlson, GD
    Harris, GJ
    Brandt, J
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1996, 53 (12) : 1293 - 1296
  • [3] Comparison of qualitative and quantitative analyses of age-related changes in clivus bone marrow on MR Imaging
    Bayramoglu, A
    Aydingöz, U
    Hayran, M
    Öztürk, H
    Cumhur, M
    [J]. CLINICAL ANATOMY, 2003, 16 (04) : 304 - 308
  • [4] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [5] Anatomical MRI study of basal ganglia in bipolar disorder patients
    Brambilla, P
    Harenski, K
    Nicoletti, MA
    Mallinger, AG
    Frank, E
    Kupfer, DJ
    Keshavan, MS
    Soares, JC
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING, 2001, 106 (02) : 65 - 80
  • [6] Imaging basal ganglia function
    Brooks, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANATOMY, 2000, 196 : 543 - 554
  • [7] Brunetti A, 2000, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V11, P260, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(200003)11:3<260::AID-JMRI4>3.0.CO
  • [8] 2-I
  • [9] Corson PW, 1999, AM J PSYCHIAT, V156, P1200
  • [10] Normal brain development and aging: Quantitative analysis at in vivo MR imaging in healthy volunteers
    Courchesne, E
    Chisum, HJ
    Townsend, J
    Cowles, A
    Covington, J
    Egaas, B
    Harwood, M
    Hinds, S
    Press, GA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 216 (03) : 672 - 682