Social anxiety is associated with general but not specific biases in emotion recognition

被引:39
作者
Button, Katherine [1 ]
Lewis, Glyn [1 ]
Penton-Voak, Ian [2 ]
Munafo, Marcus [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Social & Community Med, Bristol BS8 2BN, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Sch Expt Psychol, Bristol BS8 1TU, Avon, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Cost attributions; Emotions; Cognitive bias; Face processing; NEGATIVE-EVALUATION-SCALE; FACIAL EXPRESSIONS; PSYCHIATRIC-DISORDER; THREATENING FACES; BRIEF VERSION; PHOBIA; FEAR; VALIDATION; PROBABILITY; SEVERITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.psychres.2013.06.005
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Misreading facial expressions as signals of social disapproval, such as anger and disgust, may maintain social anxiety. If so, manipulating face processing could be therapeutic. It remains unclear, however, whether socially anxious individuals are in fact more sensitive to disapproving emotions. We assessed decoding of, and cost attributions to, emotional expressions in high and low socially anxious females (n=102) using five emotions (anger, disgust, fear, happiness, and sadness) expressed at 15 intensities (9-65%), providing 75 stimuli (see Supplementary Material). The decoding task briefly presented the stimuli and participants identified the emotion. The cost attribution task asked individuals to rate each stimulus for how costly it would be for them to interact with the person. Random effects regression indicated that social anxiety was not associated with overall decoding accuracy but was associated with a response bias. High socially anxious individuals had a lower threshold for decoding emotions but also more frequently classified low intensity emotions incorrectly. These effects were not emotion-specific. Socially anxious individuals also attributed excessive social cost to expressions of negative valence. Our results provide a novel conceptual framework for understanding emotion decoding in social anxiety, indicating the importance of considering both accuracy and response bias. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 207
页数:9
相关论文
共 57 条
[11]   The validity of the brief version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale [J].
Collins, KA ;
Westra, HA ;
Dozois, DJA ;
Stewart, SH .
JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2005, 19 (03) :345-359
[12]   Amygdala activation in the processing of neutral faces in social anxiety disorder:: Is neutral really neutral? [J].
Cooney, Rebecca E. ;
Atlas, Lauren Y. ;
Joormann, Jutta ;
Eugene, Fanny ;
Gotlib, Ian H. .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING, 2006, 148 (01) :55-59
[13]  
Craske M.G., 2003, ORIGINS PHOBIAS ANXI
[14]   PAN-CULTURAL ELEMENTS IN FACIAL DISPLAYS OF EMOTION [J].
EKMAN, P ;
SORENSON, ER ;
FRIESEN, WV .
SCIENCE, 1969, 164 (3875) :86-&
[15]   Cognitive biases in generalized social phobia [J].
Foa, EB ;
Franklin, ME ;
Perry, KJ ;
Herbert, JD .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 105 (03) :433-439
[16]   Common changes in cerebral blood flow in patients with social phobia treated with citalopram or cognitive-behavioral therapy [J].
Furmark, T ;
Tillfors, M ;
Marteinsdottir, I ;
Fischer, H ;
Pissiota, A ;
Långström, B ;
Fredrikson, M .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 59 (05) :425-433
[17]   Impaired identification of fearful faces in Generalised Social Phobia [J].
Garner, Matthew ;
Baldwin, David S. ;
Bradley, Brendan P. ;
Mogg, Karin .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2009, 115 (03) :460-465
[18]   Anticipated reactions to social events: Differences among individuals with generalized social phobia, obsessive compulsive disorder, and nonanxious controls [J].
Gilboa-Schechtman, E ;
Franklin, ME ;
Foa, EB .
COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH, 2000, 24 (06) :731-746
[19]   The factor structure of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale [J].
Heidenreich, Thomas ;
Schermelleh-Engel, Karin ;
Schramm, Elisabeth ;
Hofmann, Stefan G. ;
Stangier, Ulrich .
JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2011, 25 (04) :579-583
[20]   Information processing in social phobia: A critical review [J].
Heinrichs, N ;
Hofmann, SG .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2001, 21 (05) :751-770