Ranking DMUs by Comparing DEA Cross-Efficiency Intervals Using Entropy Measures

被引:13
|
作者
Lu, Tim [1 ]
Liu, Shiang-Tai [2 ]
机构
[1] Vanung Univ, Dept Mkt & Logist, Taoyuan 320, Taiwan
[2] Vanung Univ, Grad Sch Business & Management, Taoyuan 320, Taiwan
关键词
data envelopment analysis; cross-efficiency; entropy; ranking; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; COMMON WEIGHTS; MODEL; PERFORMANCE; UNITS;
D O I
10.3390/e18120452
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Cross-efficiency evaluation, an extension of data envelopment analysis (DEA), can eliminate unrealistic weighing schemes and provide a ranking for decision making units (DMUs). In the literature, the determination of input and output weights uniquely receives more attentions. However, the problem of choosing the aggressive (minimal) or benevolent (maximal) formulation for decision-making might still remain. In this paper, we develop a procedure to perform cross-efficiency evaluation without the need to make any specific choice of DEA weights. The proposed procedure takes into account the aggressive and benevolent formulations at the same time, and the choice of DEA weights can then be avoided. Consequently, a number of cross-efficiency intervals is obtained for each DMU. The entropy, which is based on information theory, is an effective tool to measure the uncertainty. We then utilize the entropy to construct a numerical index for DMUs with cross-efficiency intervals. A mathematical program is proposed to find the optimal entropy values of DMUs for comparison. With the derived entropy value, we can rank DMUs accordingly. Two examples are illustrated to show the effectiveness of the idea proposed in this paper.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] DEA cross-efficiency ranking method considering satisfaction and consensus degree
    Wu, Dongdong
    Wang, Yuhong
    Liu, Yong
    Wu, Jie
    INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (06) : 3470 - 3492
  • [22] Using the gradient line for ranking DMUs in DEA
    Jahanshahloo, GR
    Sanei, M
    Lotfi, FH
    Shoja, N
    APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2004, 151 (01) : 209 - 219
  • [23] Using DEA cross-efficiency evaluation for suppliers ranking in the presence of non-discretionary inputs
    Noorizadeh, Abdollah
    Mahdiloo, Mahdi
    Saen, Reza Farzipoor
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SHIPPING AND TRANSPORT LOGISTICS, 2013, 5 (01) : 95 - 111
  • [24] DEA cross-efficiency aggregation method based upon Shannon entropy
    Wu, Jie
    Sun, Jiasen
    Liang, Liang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2012, 50 (23) : 6726 - 6736
  • [25] Slack-based ranking method: an interpretation to the cross-efficiency method in DEA
    Bao, C-P
    Chen, T-H
    Chang, S-Y
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2008, 59 (06) : 860 - 862
  • [26] An Alternative Approach to Rank Efficient DMUs in DEA via Cross-Efficiency Evaluation, Gini Coefficient, and Bonferroni Mean
    Zahra Behdani
    Majid Darehmiraki
    Journal of the Operations Research Society of China, 2022, 10 (4) : 763 - 783
  • [27] An Alternative Approach to Rank Efficient DMUs in DEA via Cross-Efficiency Evaluation, Gini Coefficient, and Bonferroni Mean
    Behdani, Zahra
    Darehmiraki, Majid
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONS RESEARCH SOCIETY OF CHINA, 2022, 10 (04) : 763 - 783
  • [28] Ranking ranges in cross-efficiency evaluations
    Alcaraz, Javier
    Ramon, Nuria
    Ruiz, Jose L.
    Sirvent, Inmaculada
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2013, 226 (03) : 516 - 521
  • [29] A complete ranking of DMUs using restrictions in DEA models
    Alirezaee, M. R.
    Afsharian, M.
    APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2007, 189 (02) : 1550 - 1559
  • [30] Note: Ranking DMUs with infeasible super-efficiency DEA models
    Xue, M
    Harker, PT
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2002, 48 (05) : 705 - 710