Biodiversity conservation: The key is reducing meat consumption

被引:284
作者
Machovina, Brian [1 ,2 ]
Feeley, Kenneth J. [1 ,2 ]
Ripple, William J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Florida Int Univ, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[2] Fairchild Trop Bot Garden, Coral Gables, FL 33156 USA
[3] Oregon State Univ, Dept Forest Ecosyst & Soc, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
关键词
Biodiversity loss; Livestock; Meat consumption; Climate change; Permaculture; CROP-ANIMAL SYSTEMS; LAND-USE CHANGE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION; FOOD SECURITY; GLOBAL LIVESTOCK; EXTINCTION RISK; CARBON STOCKS; AQUACULTURE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.022
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The consumption of animal-sourced food products by humans is one of the most powerful negative forces affecting the conservation of terrestrial ecosystems and biological diversity. Livestock production is the single largest driver of habitat loss, and both livestock and feedstock production are increasing in developing tropical countries where the majority of biological diversity resides. Bushmeat consumption in Africa and southeastern Asia, as well as the high growth-rate of per capita livestock consumption in China are of special concern. The projected land base required by 2050 to support livestock production in several megadiverse countries exceeds 30-50% of their current agricultural areas. Livestock production is also a leading cause of climate change, soil loss, water and nutrient pollution, and decreases of apex predators and wild herbivores, compounding pressures on ecosystems and biodiversity. It is possible to greatly reduce the impacts of animal product consumption by humans on natural ecosystems and biodiversity while meeting nutritional needs of people, including the projected 2-3 billion people to be added to human population. We suggest that impacts can be remediated through several solutions: (1) reducing demand for animal-based food products and increasing proportions of plant-based foods in diets, the latter ideally to a global average of 90% of food consumed; (2) replacing ecologically-inefficient ruminants (e.g. cattle, goats, sheep) and bushmeat with monogastrics (e.g. poultry, pigs), integrated aquaculture, and other more-efficient protein sources; and (3) reintegrating livestock production away from single-product, intensive, fossil-fuel based systems into diverse, coupled systems designed more closely around the structure and functions of ecosystems that conserve energy and nutrients. Such efforts would also impart positive impacts on human health through reduction of diseases of nutritional extravagance. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 431
页数:13
相关论文
共 140 条
[1]  
Alexandratos N., 2012, WORLD AGR 2030 2050, DOI 10.22004/ag.econ.288998
[2]  
Alteri MA, 2002, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V93, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00085-3
[3]  
Altieri M.a., 2012, Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2, 10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_1, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_1]
[4]   INSITU CONSERVATION OF CROP GENETIC-RESOURCES THROUGH MAINTENANCE OF TRADITIONAL FARMING SYSTEMS [J].
ALTIERI, MA ;
MERRICK, LC .
ECONOMIC BOTANY, 1987, 41 (01) :86-96
[5]   Agroecologically efficient agricultural systems for smallholder farmers: contributions to food sovereignty [J].
Altieri, Miguel A. ;
Funes-Monzote, Fernando R. ;
Petersen, Paulo .
AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 32 (01) :1-13
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, USDA NAT NUTR DAT ST
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, FAOSTAT
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1997, MEGADIVERSITY
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2009, INTEGRATED MARICULTU
[10]  
[Anonymous], LIVELIHOOD ALTERNATI