Biochemical Recurrence Prediction in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients, Following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Yamaguchi, Noriya [1 ]
Yumioka, Tetsuya [1 ]
Iwamoto, Hideto [1 ]
Masago, Toshihiko [1 ]
Morizane, Shuichi [1 ]
Honda, Masashi [1 ]
Sejima, Takehiro [2 ]
Takenaka, Atsushi [1 ]
机构
[1] Tottori Univ, Sch Med, Div Urol, Fac Med,Dept Surg, Yonago, Tottori 6838503, Japan
[2] Matsue City Hosp, Dept Urol, Matsue, Shimane 6908509, Japan
关键词
biochemical recurrence; high-risk prostate cancer; robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; ANDROGEN SUPPRESSION; RADIATION-THERAPY; MEN; RADIOTHERAPY; TRIAL; STRATIFICATION; EXPERIENCE; CARCINOMA; ADJUVANT; OUTCOMES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background High-risk prostate cancer treatment has been controversial. Some high-risk prostate cancer patients fail to respond to radical prostatectomy only. Thus, we aimed to investigate the predictive factors for biochemical recurrence (BCR) and identify patients who could achieve sufficient therapeutic effect by radical prostatectomy only. Methods Of 264 medical records reviewed, 141 low-intermediate-risk and 100 high-risk prostate cancer patients, excluding those who had received neoadjuvant hormone therapy, were analyzed. BCR was defined as the first increase in prostate-specific antigen levels (>= 0.2 ng/mL), with levels not decreasing to undetectable limits, after radical prostatectomy. Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to determine the prognostic factors. We investigated the perioperative predictive factors for BCR and BCR-free survival rates, with the number of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) high-risk factors for high-risk prostate cancer patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Results Multivariate analyses showed that clinical T3 was significantly associated with BCR [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.052; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.26-12.99; P = 0.019]. Of the 100 patients, 77 had 1 high-risk factor and 23 had = 2 high-risk factors; the 1-year BCR-free survival rate of patients with 1 high-risk factor and those with = 2 high-risk factors was 94.8% and 69.6%, respectively. Patients with = 2 high-risk factors were significantly associated with BCR (P = 0.002). No difference in BCR rate between patients with 1 high-risk factor and those with low- and intermediate-risk was found. Conclusion High-risk prostate cancer patients with 1 NCCN high-risk factor can be considered for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy treatment only.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 295
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Stratification of Contemporary Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for High-risk Prostate Cancer
    Jo, Jung Ki
    Kook, Ha Rim
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Lee, Sang Eun
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 (06) : 2088 - 2093
  • [32] Performance characteristics of prostate-specific antigen density and biopsy core details to predict oncological outcome in patients with intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Yashi, Masahiro
    Nukui, Akinori
    Tokura, Yuumi
    Takei, Kohei
    Suzuki, Issei
    Sakamoto, Kazumasa
    Yuki, Hideo
    Kambara, Tsunehito
    Betsunoh, Hironori
    Abe, Hideyuki
    Fukabori, Yoshitatsu
    Nakazato, Yoshimasa
    Kaji, Yasushi
    Kamai, Takao
    BMC UROLOGY, 2017, 17
  • [33] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients after endoscopic surgeries on the prostate
    Guliev, B. G.
    Ilyin, D. M.
    Kharchenko, P. V.
    Talyshinskiy, A. E.
    Krylov, O. A.
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2023, 19 (04): : 77 - 85
  • [34] Significance of the cribriform morphology area ratio for biochemical recurrence in Gleason score 4+4 prostate cancer patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Shimodaira, Kenji
    Inoue, Rie
    Hashimoto, Takeshi
    Satake, Naoya
    Shishido, Toshihide
    Namiki, Kazunori
    Harada, Kazuharu
    Nagao, Toshitaka
    Ohno, Yoshio
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (05):
  • [35] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy significantly reduced biochemical recurrence compared to retro pubic radical prostatectomy
    Fujimura, Tetsuya
    Fukuhara, Hiroshi
    Taguchi, Satoru
    Yamada, Yuta
    Sugihara, Toru
    Nakagawa, Tohru
    Niimi, Aya
    Kume, Haruki
    Igawa, Yasuhiko
    Homma, Yukio
    BMC CANCER, 2017, 17
  • [36] Predictive factors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer
    Murata, Yukiko
    Tatsugami, Katsunori
    Yoshikawa, Masahiro
    Hamaguchi, Masumitsu
    Yamada, Shigetomo
    Hayakawa, Yusuke
    Ueda, Kouhei
    Momosaki, Seiya
    Sakamoto, Naotaka
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 25 (03) : 284 - 289
  • [37] Radical Prostatectomy as Primary Treatment of High-risk Prostate Cancer
    Alexandre Ingels
    Alexandre de la Taille
    Guillaume Ploussard
    Current Urology Reports, 2012, 13 : 179 - 186
  • [38] Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Potential Cancer Control in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer
    Takagi, Kimiaki
    Kawase, Makoto
    Kato, Daiki
    Kawase, Kota
    Takai, Manabu
    Iinuma, Koji
    Nakane, Keita
    Hagiwara, Noriyasu
    Yamada, Toru
    Tomioka, Masayuki
    Koie, Takuya
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (04) : 2864 - 2870
  • [39] Preoperative Predictors of Biochemical Recurrence-Free Survival in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Following Radical Prostatectomy
    Nkengurutse, Gerard
    Tian, Feng
    Jiang, Sixiong
    Wang, Qi
    Wang, Ying
    Sun, Weibing
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [40] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy of clinical high-risk patients with prostate cancer: A controlled study of operative and short-term postoperative events
    Brennhovd, Bjorn
    Axcrona, Karol
    Fossa, Sophie D.
    Giercksky, Karl-Erik
    Vlatkovic, Ljiljana
    Dahl, Alv A.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 47 (06) : 449 - 455