Do phosphorus requirements for RNA limit genome size in crustacean zooplankton?

被引:29
|
作者
Hessen, Dag O. [1 ]
Ventura, Marc [2 ,3 ]
Elser, James J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Dept Biol, CEES, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
[2] NERI, Dept Freshwater Ecol, DK-8600 Silkeborg, Denmark
[3] Spanish Res Council CSIC, Ctr Adv Studies Blanes CEAB, Limnol Grp UB, Blanes 17300, Girona, Spain
[4] Arizona State Univ, Sch Life Sci, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
cladoceran; copepod; genome size; phosphorus; RNA;
D O I
10.1139/G08-053
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
As for most other organisms, genome size in zooplankton differs widely. This may have a range of consequences for growth rate, development, and life history strategies, yet the causes of this pronounced variability are not settled. Here we propose that small genome size may be an evolutionary consequence of phosphorus (P) allocation from DNA to RNA tinder P deficiency. To test this hypothesis we have compared the two major groups of zooplankton, copepods and cladocerans, that have overlapping niches and body size. Relative to the cladocerans, copepods have a more complex life history and a lower mass-specific P content, while cladocerans tend to have higher P and RNA contents and higher specific growth rates and frequently experience P-limited growth, likely due to a shortage of P for ribosome synthesis. Cladocerans also generally have smaller genomes than copepods (1C = 0. 17-0.63 pg DNA-cell(-1) vs. 1C = 0. 10-10 pg DNA-cell(-1)). Furthermore, cladocerans have a higher slope of the relationship of body size with DNA content (1.5 vs. 0.29 in copepods) and present almost 15-fold higher RNA:DNA ratios (24.8 in cladocerans vs. 1.6 in copepods). Hence, small genome size in cladocerans could reflect an evolutionary pressure towards "efficient" genomes to conserve a key element needed to maximize growth rate. We do not claim that this is a universal cause of genome size variability, but propose that streamlining of 2enomes could be related to P conservation rather than energy conservation. This could be relevant for a range of organisms that may suffer P-limited growth rates.
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 691
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Do RNA viruses require genome cyclisation for replication?
    Lott, William B.
    Doran, Michael R.
    TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 38 (07) : 350 - 355
  • [32] Microcystins derived from lysing Microcystis cells do not cause negative effects on crustacean zooplankton in Lake Taihu, China
    Feizhou Chen
    Xi Dai
    Tingting Shu
    Ramesh D. Gulati
    Zhengwen Liu
    Aquatic Ecology, 2013, 47 : 379 - 387
  • [33] Time Constraints Do Not Limit Group Size in Arboreal Guenons but Do Explain Community Size and Distribution Patterns
    Amanda H. Korstjens
    Julia Lehmann
    R. I. M. Dunbar
    International Journal of Primatology, 2018, 39 : 511 - 531
  • [34] A planarian nidovirus expands the limits of RNA genome size
    Saberi, Amir
    Gulyaeva, Anastasia A.
    Brubacher, John L.
    Newmark, Phillip A.
    Gorbalenya, Alexander E.
    PLOS PATHOGENS, 2018, 14 (11)
  • [35] Evaluation of the responsiveness of the crustacean zooplankton community size spectrum to environmental change and an exotic invader in a sample of Canadian Shield lakes
    Barth, Lauren Emily
    Shuter, Brian John
    Sprules, William Gary
    Minns, Charles Kenneth
    Rusak, James Anthony
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2021, 78 (03) : 197 - 217
  • [36] Time Constraints Do Not Limit Group Size in Arboreal Guenons but Do Explain Community Size and Distribution Patterns
    Korstjens, Amanda H.
    Lehmann, Julia
    Dunbar, R. I. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY, 2018, 39 (04) : 511 - 531
  • [37] Do Wave Impact Forces Limit the Size of Intertidal Organisms?
    Jensen, M. M.
    Denny, M. W.
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2013, 53 : E103 - E103
  • [38] Impact of transposable elements on genome size variation between two closely related crustacean species
    Becking, Thomas
    Gilbert, Clement
    Cordaux, Richard
    ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2020, 600
  • [39] Evaluating the potential of direct RNA nanopore sequencing: Metatranscriptomics highlights possible seasonal differences in a marine pelagic crustacean zooplankton community
    Semmouri, Ilias
    De Schamphelaere, Karel A. C.
    Mees, Jan
    Janssen, Colin R.
    Asselman, Jana
    MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2020, 153
  • [40] HOW DO VIRAL REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASES RECOGNIZE THEIR RNA GENOME
    MESNARD, JM
    LEBEURIER, G
    FEBS LETTERS, 1991, 287 (1-2) : 1 - 4