Toward a low cost and high performance MPC: The role of system identification

被引:42
作者
Zhu, Yucai [1 ]
Patwardhan, Rohit [2 ]
Wagner, Stephen B. [2 ]
Zhao, Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, State Key Lab Ind Control Technol, Dept Control Sci & Engn, Hangzhou 310027, Peoples R China
[2] Saudi Aramco, ES, P&CSD, Adv Proc Solut Div, Dhahran 31311, Saudi Arabia
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Model predictive control (MPC); System identification; Control performance monitoring; Disturbance model; Model error detection;
D O I
10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.07.005
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The high cost of model predictive control (MPC) technology has hampered its wide application in process industries beyond the refining/petrochemical industry. This work strives to increase the efficiency of MPC deployment. First, a semi-automatic MPC system is introduced. It consists of three modules: an MPC module, an online identification module and a control monitor module. The goal of the MPC technology is twofold: (1) to considerably reduce the cost of MPC commissioning and maintenance and (2) to increase control performance. System identification plays important roles in all the three parts of the MPC system. In the identification module, the so-called ASYM method of identification is used. It is demonstrated with an industrial application. In the control module, adaptive disturbance model identification is developed for improving control performance; in the monitor module, a method of model error detection method is developed. Industrial applications and simulations are used to demonstrate the ideas. Finally, we comment on some industrial needs on MPC research and development. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 135
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, SYSTEM IDENTIFICATIO
[2]   Quantifying the impact of model-plant mismatch on controller performance [J].
Badwe, Abhijit S. ;
Patwardhan, Rohit S. ;
Shah, Sirish L. ;
Patwardhan, Sachin C. ;
Gudi, Ravindra D. .
JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2010, 20 (04) :408-425
[3]   Detection of model-plant mismatch in MPC applications [J].
Badwe, Abhijit S. ;
Gudi, Ravindra D. ;
Patwardhan, Rohit S. ;
Shah, Sirish L. ;
Patwardhan, Sachin C. .
JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2009, 19 (08) :1305-1313
[4]  
Celaya P., 2004, P NPRA PLANT AUT DEC
[5]  
Celaya P., 2005, P NPRA O A TECHN FOR
[6]  
Cutler C. R., 1988, Proceedings of the 1988 American Control Conference, P284
[7]   MPC: Current practice and challenges [J].
Darby, Mark L. ;
Nikolaou, Michael .
CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2012, 20 (04) :328-342
[8]   Discriminating between disturbance and process model mismatch in model predictive control [J].
Harrison, Christopher A. ;
Qin, S. Joe .
JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2009, 19 (10) :1610-1616
[9]   A method of MPC model error detection [J].
Ji, Guoli ;
Zhang, Kangkang ;
Zhu, Yucai .
JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2012, 22 (03) :635-642
[10]  
Kalafatis A, 2006, HYDROCARB PROCESS, V85, P93