Comparison of an antioxidant system in tolerant and susceptible wheat seedlings in response to salt stress

被引:18
|
作者
Fekiu, Kaouthar [1 ,2 ]
Tounsi, Sana [2 ]
Brini, Faical [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Carthage Tunis, Ctr Biotechnol Bordj Cedria, Lab Legumes, BP 901, Hammam Lif 2050, Tunisia
[2] Univ Sfax, Ctr Biotechnol Sfax, Biotechnol & Plant Improvement Lab, BP 1177, Sfax 3018, Tunisia
关键词
antioxidant; oxidant; reactive oxygen species; salinity; Triticum durum; MANGANESE-SUPEROXIDE-DISMUTASE; TRANSGENIC TOBACCO SEEDLINGS; INDUCED OXIDATIVE STRESS; LIPID-PEROXIDATION; HYDROGEN-PEROXIDE; SALINITY STRESS; DURUM-WHEAT; DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE; ENZYME-ACTIVITIES; ASCORBIC-ACID;
D O I
10.5424/sjar/2017154-11507
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
It has been demonstrated previously that the physiological and molecular analysis of seedlings of the tolerant (Om Rabia3) and susceptible (Mahmoudi) Tunisian wheat genotypes were different at short and long-term response to salinity. In this study, we examined the antioxidant defence system in seedlings of these two cultivars at short-term response to different NaCl concentrations. The findings showed that high salinity tolerance of cv. Om Rabia3, as manifested by lower decrease in its dry biomass, was associated with lower malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide contents, lower accumulation of the superoxide (O-2) in the roots and the shoots, and also lower decrease in ascorbate content than those in cv. Mahmoudi. Moreover, the expression of some genes coding for antioxidant enzymes such as the catalase, the superoxide dismutase and the peroxidase were enhanced by NaCl stress especially in the salt-tolerant cultivar. In parallel, their activities were increased in response to the same condition of stress and especially in the cv. Om Rabia3. Taken together, these data suggested that the capacity to limit oxidative damage is important for NaCl tolerance of durum wheat.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Proteome response of salt tolerant and susceptible durum wheat to salt stress
    Karimi, R.
    Salekdeh, G. Hosseini
    MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS, 2005, 4 (08) : S293 - S293
  • [2] Antioxidant parameters under salt stress in drought tolerant and susceptible wheat cultivars
    Kaur L.
    Zhawar V.K.
    Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2016, 21 (1): : 101 - 106
  • [3] Differences in antioxidant activity in response to salinity stress in tolerant and susceptible wheat genotypes
    Sairam, RK
    Srivastava, GC
    Agarwal, S
    Meena, RC
    BIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2005, 49 (01) : 85 - 91
  • [4] Changes in antioxidant activity in sub-cellular fractions of tolerant and susceptible wheat genotypes in response to long term salt stress
    Sairam, RK
    Srivastava, GC
    PLANT SCIENCE, 2002, 162 (06) : 897 - 904
  • [5] Antioxidant defense mechanism under salt stress in wheat seedlings
    Mandhania, S
    Madan, S
    Sawhney, V
    BIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2006, 50 (02) : 227 - 231
  • [6] Antioxidant Response to Salinity in Salt-Tolerant and Salt-Susceptible Cultivars of Date Palm
    Al Kharusi, Latifa
    Al Yahyai, Rashid
    Yaish, Mahmoud W.
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2019, 9 (01):
  • [7] Differential response of antioxidant compounds to salinity stress in salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive seedlings of foxtail millet (Setaria italica)
    Sreenivasulu, N
    Grimm, B
    Wobus, U
    Weschke, W
    PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2000, 109 (04) : 435 - 442
  • [8] Differential Response of Salt-Tolerant and Susceptible Barley Genotypes to Salinity Stress
    Tavakoli, F.
    Vazan, S.
    Moradi, F.
    Shiran, B.
    Sorkheh, K.
    JOURNAL OF CROP IMPROVEMENT, 2010, 24 (03) : 244 - 260
  • [9] COMPARISON OF THE GENETIC ORGANIZATION OF THE EARLY SALT-STRESS-RESPONSE GENE SYSTEM IN SALT-TOLERANT LOPHOPYRUM-ELONGATUM AND SALT-SENSITIVE WHEAT
    DUBCOVSKY, J
    GALVEZ, AF
    DVORAK, J
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1994, 87 (08) : 957 - 964
  • [10] Induction of oxidative stress and antioxidant activity by hydrogen peroxide treatment in tolerant and susceptible wheat genotypes
    Sairam, RK
    Srivastava, GC
    BIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2000, 43 (03) : 381 - 386