Schools' Participation in the Community Eligibility Provision Affects Students' Receipt of Emergency Benefits during the COVID-19 Pandemic

被引:3
作者
Acciai, Francesco [1 ]
Ohri-Vachaspati, Punam [1 ]
Yedidia, Michael J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Coll Hlth Solut, Phoenix, AZ 85004 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Ctr State Hlth Policy, Inst Hlth Hlth Care Policy & Aging Res, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
关键词
community eligibility provision; Pandemic Electronic Benefits Transfer; free or reduced-price meal eligibility; P-EBT;
D O I
10.3390/nu14224919
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Pandemic Electronic Benefits Transfer (P-EBT) benefits were intended for families of school children who lost access to free or reduced-price school meals (FRPMs) during the COVID-19 pandemic-related school closures. In high-poverty communities, all students from schools participating in the Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) were automatically eligible for P-EBT benefits; in non-CEP schools, only students already participating in FRPMs-for which their parents submitted an individual application-were eligible for P-EBT benefits. Using publicly available data from 105 K-12 public schools located in 4 sizeable low-income New Jersey (NJ) cities, this study investigated the association between school CEP participation status and the reach of P-EBT benefits for eligible students. A generalized linear model with a logit link, a binomial family, and robust standard errors was used. Across all levels of FRPM eligibility based on students' household income, as expected, almost all students from CEP schools received P-EBT benefits; significantly fewer received P-EBT benefits if they attended non-CEP schools, even when they were eligible for FRPMs. Our findings show that without changes to the qualification process for CEP, large numbers of eligible children will not receive the intended health benefits of federal meals programs or similar emergency relief initiatives. Expanding CEP eligibility and simplifying the process through which schools qualify would likely improve the uptake of federal meals programs and emergency interventions, and more effectively achieve their intent.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, QUICKFACTS
[2]   Federal Nutrition Programs after the Pandemic: Learning from P-EBT and SNAP to Create the Next Generation of Food Safety Net Programs [J].
Balasuriya, Lilanthi ;
Berkowitz, Seth A. ;
Seligman, Hilary K. .
INQUIRY-THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION PROVISION AND FINANCING, 2021, 58
[3]  
Bauer L., The Effect of Pandemic EBT on Measures of Food Hardship
[4]   Stata tip 63: Modeling proportions [J].
Baum, Christopher F. .
STATA JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (02) :299-303
[5]  
Billings K., 2020, C RES SERV MAY, V20, P529
[6]   Qualitative Study of Participation Facilitators and Barriers for Emergency School Meals and Pandemic Electronic Benefits (P-EBT) in an Urban Setting during COVID-19 [J].
Cadenhead, Jennifer W. ;
McCarthy, Julia E. ;
Nguyen, Thanh Thanh T. ;
Rodriguez, Michelle ;
Koch, Pamela A. .
NUTRIENTS, 2022, 14 (16)
[7]  
ColemanJensen A., 2018, Household Food Security in the United States in 2017.
[8]  
Department of Human Services, 2021, NJ SNAP US YOUR EL B
[9]  
Food Research & Action Center (FRAC), 2019, School meals are essential for student health and learning
[10]  
Food Research & Action Center (FRAC), 2021, COMM EL CEP DAT