Performance of Binax NOW Flu A and B and direct fluorescent assay in comparison with a composite of viral culture or reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for detection of influenza infection during the 2006 to 2007 season

被引:30
作者
Rahman, Mahbubur [1 ]
Vandennause, Mary F. [2 ]
Kieke, Burney A. [2 ]
Belongia, Edward A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Galveston, Med Branch, Ctr Interdisciplinary Res Womens Hlth, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[2] Marshfield Clin Res Fdn & Matshfield Clin, Marshfield, WI 54449 USA
关键词
influenza virus; rapid test; Binax NOW; direct fluorescent assay; sensitivity; specificity;
D O I
10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.10.012
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
The Binax NOW Flu A and Flu B (Binax NOW), direct fluorescent assay (DFA), and viral culture were evaluated and compared with a composite of viral Culture or reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Participants with medically attended acute respiratory illness were identified through active surveillance during the 2006 to 2007 season, and consenting individuals (n = 932) were tested for influenza by Culture and RT-PCR. Physicians ordered a rapid antigen test (Binax NOW [n = 73] or DFA [n = 70]) according to their clinical judgment. The Binax NOW detected 11 of 18 influenza infections (sensitivity, 61%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 36-83%)), whereas DFA detected 17 of 21 influenza infections (sensitivity 81%, 95% Cl, 58-95%). Compared with culture/RT-PCR, specificity of both Binax NOW and DFA was 100%. During the 2006 to 2007 Influenza season, DFA and Binax NOW demonstrated high specificity but failed to identify a substantial proportion Of Influenza infections. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 166
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Alexander R, 2005, COMMUN DIS INTELL, V29, P272
  • [2] Dooley Samuel W., 2008, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V57, P1
  • [3] Clinical and financial benefits of rapid detection of respiratory viruses: an outcomes study
    Barenfanger, J
    Drake, C
    Leon, N
    Mueller, T
    Troutt, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 38 (08) : 2824 - 2828
  • [4] Cazacu AC, 2004, J CLIN MICROBIOL, V42, P3707, DOI [10.1128/JCM.42.8.3707-3710.2004, 10.1128/jcm.42.8.3707-3710.2004]
  • [5] Comparison of lateral-flow immunoassay and enzyme immunoassay with viral culture for rapid detection of influenza virus in nasal wash specimens from children
    Cazacu, AC
    Greer, J
    Taherivand, M
    Demmler, GJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (05) : 2132 - 2134
  • [6] Evaluation of the Directigen FluA+B test for rapid diagnosis of influenza virus type A and B infections
    Chan, KH
    Maldeis, N
    Pope, W
    Yup, A
    Ozinskas, A
    Gill, J
    Seto, WH
    Shortridge, KF
    Peiris, JSM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 40 (05) : 1675 - 1680
  • [7] Collett D, 1991, MODELLING BINARY DAT
  • [8] Performance characteristics of a rapid immunochromatographic assay for detection of influenza virus in children during the 2003 to 2004 influenza season
    Cruz, AT
    Cazacu, AC
    McBride, LJ
    Greer, JM
    Demmier, GJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2006, 47 (03) : 250 - 254
  • [9] DAISY JA, 1979, J CLIN MICROBIOL, V9, P688
  • [10] Epidemiologic research in an integrated regional medical care system: The Marshfield Epidemiologic Study Area
    DeStefano, F
    Eaker, ED
    Broste, SK
    Nordstrom, DL
    Peissig, PL
    Vierkant, RA
    Konitzer, KA
    Gruber, RL
    Layde, PM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1996, 49 (06) : 643 - 652