An Evaluation of Repeat Stool Testing for Clostridium difficile Infection by Polymerase Chain Reaction

被引:25
|
作者
Khanna, Sahil [1 ]
Pardi, Darrell S. [1 ]
Rosenblatt, Jon E. [4 ]
Patel, Robin [2 ,3 ]
Kammer, Patricia P. [1 ]
Baddour, Larry M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Clin Microbiol, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Div Infect Dis, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Lab Med & Pathol, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
Clostridium difficile infection; polymerase chain reaction; laboratory testing; screening efficacy; CULTURE CYTOTOXICITY ASSAY; REAL-TIME PCR; ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY; DIAGNOSIS; TOXIN; DIARRHEA; GUIDELINES; COLITIS; SOCIETY; SAMPLES;
D O I
10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182432273
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Goals: To evaluate the yield of repeat stool polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in patients with suspected Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Background: CDI is a major challenge in health care due to its frequent occurrence and high associated costs. Enzyme immunoassay and PCR are commonly performed diagnostic tests for CDI. Methods: Our microbiology laboratory database was queried from January 1, 2008 to June 30, 2010 for all patients who underwent PCR stool testing for suspected CDI. Data collected included age, sex, number of stool tests performed within a 14-day period after the first test, and location of patient (inpatient vs. outpatient). Analyses were performed using JMP version 9.0.1. Results: PCR testing was performed in 15,515 patients. The median age was 58.3 years (range, 10 d to 104.3 y) and 46.2% of patients were women. Repeat testing was infrequent; 87.3% of patients had testing performed only once in a 14-day period. Increased age, male sex, and inpatient location were predictors of repeat testing. The median time between an initial test and the first repeat test was 5 days. After an initial negative test, the percentage of patients having a subsequent positive test was low (2.7% in 7 d and 3.2% in 14 d). The percentage of repeat tests that was positive within 7 days (2.9%) was lower than the percentage that was positive from day 8 to day 14 (4.8%, P = 0.05). Conclusions: Repeat testing for C. difficile has a low yield, and patients with an initial negative test should not routinely be retested.
引用
收藏
页码:846 / 849
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of Nested Polymerase Chain Reaction and Immunoassay for Rapid Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile in Children with Community Acquired Diarrhea
    Elewa, Ahmed
    El Sayed-Zaki, Maysaa
    CLINICAL LABORATORY, 2017, 63 (02) : 321 - 326
  • [42] A Rare Case of Polymerase Chain Reaction-Negative Severe Clostridioides difficile Infection
    Iheagwara, Charity C.
    Lopez, Carlos Cantu
    Otaluka, Onyinye N.
    Okwesili, Byron
    Belinski, Vadim
    Muhanna, Ala
    Tewoldemedhin, Bereket
    Slim, Jihad
    Szabela, Maria
    Boghossian, Jack
    Bains, Yatinder
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (12)
  • [43] The Distribution of Enteric Infections Utilizing Stool Microbial Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing in Clinical Practice
    Axelrad, Jordan E.
    Joelson, Andrew
    Nobel, Yael
    Whittier, Susan
    Lawlor, Garrett
    Riddle, Mark S.
    Green, Peter H. R.
    Lebwohl, Benjamin
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2018, 63 (07) : 1900 - 1909
  • [44] Real-time polymerase chain reaction testing for Clostridium difficile reduces isolation time and improves patient management in a small community hospital
    Catanzaro, Mary
    Cirone, Justin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2012, 40 (07) : 663 - 666
  • [45] Discrepancies in testing recommendations for Clostridium difficile infection: updated review favors amplification test systems
    Chapin, Kimberle
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2012, 12 (03) : 223 - 226
  • [46] Economic Evaluation of Laboratory Testing Strategies for Hospital-Associated Clostridium difficile Infection
    Schroeder, Lee F.
    Robilotti, Elizabeth
    Peterson, Lance R.
    Banaei, Niaz
    Dowdy, David W.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 52 (02) : 489 - 496
  • [47] Two-step glutamate dehydrogenase antigen real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile
    Goldenberg, S. D.
    Cliff, P. R.
    Smith, S.
    Milner, M.
    French, G. L.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2010, 74 (01) : 48 - 54
  • [48] The Utility of Repeated Stool Toxin Testing for Diagnosing Clostridium difficile Colitis
    Gade, Rajesh
    Turett, Glenn
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 102 (10) : 1007 - 1009
  • [49] Effect of Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing on Population-Based Incidence Rates of Clostridium difficile Infection
    Gould, Carolyn V.
    Edwards, Jonathan R.
    Cohen, Jessica
    Bamberg, Wendy M.
    Clark, Leigh Ann
    Farley, Monica M.
    Johnston, Helen
    Nadle, Joelle
    Winston, Lisa
    Gerding, Dale N.
    McDonald, L. Clifford
    Lessa, Fernanda C.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2013, 57 (09) : 1304 - 1307
  • [50] Use of a Perianal Swab Compared With a Stool Sample to Detect Symptomatic Clostridium difficile Infection
    Montecalvo, Marisa A.
    Sisay, Emnet
    McKenna, Donna
    Wang, Guiqing
    Visintainer, Paul
    Wormser, Gary P.
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 38 (06) : 658 - 662