An Evaluation of Repeat Stool Testing for Clostridium difficile Infection by Polymerase Chain Reaction

被引:25
|
作者
Khanna, Sahil [1 ]
Pardi, Darrell S. [1 ]
Rosenblatt, Jon E. [4 ]
Patel, Robin [2 ,3 ]
Kammer, Patricia P. [1 ]
Baddour, Larry M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Clin Microbiol, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Div Infect Dis, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Lab Med & Pathol, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
Clostridium difficile infection; polymerase chain reaction; laboratory testing; screening efficacy; CULTURE CYTOTOXICITY ASSAY; REAL-TIME PCR; ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY; DIAGNOSIS; TOXIN; DIARRHEA; GUIDELINES; COLITIS; SOCIETY; SAMPLES;
D O I
10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182432273
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Goals: To evaluate the yield of repeat stool polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in patients with suspected Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Background: CDI is a major challenge in health care due to its frequent occurrence and high associated costs. Enzyme immunoassay and PCR are commonly performed diagnostic tests for CDI. Methods: Our microbiology laboratory database was queried from January 1, 2008 to June 30, 2010 for all patients who underwent PCR stool testing for suspected CDI. Data collected included age, sex, number of stool tests performed within a 14-day period after the first test, and location of patient (inpatient vs. outpatient). Analyses were performed using JMP version 9.0.1. Results: PCR testing was performed in 15,515 patients. The median age was 58.3 years (range, 10 d to 104.3 y) and 46.2% of patients were women. Repeat testing was infrequent; 87.3% of patients had testing performed only once in a 14-day period. Increased age, male sex, and inpatient location were predictors of repeat testing. The median time between an initial test and the first repeat test was 5 days. After an initial negative test, the percentage of patients having a subsequent positive test was low (2.7% in 7 d and 3.2% in 14 d). The percentage of repeat tests that was positive within 7 days (2.9%) was lower than the percentage that was positive from day 8 to day 14 (4.8%, P = 0.05). Conclusions: Repeat testing for C. difficile has a low yield, and patients with an initial negative test should not routinely be retested.
引用
收藏
页码:846 / 849
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The never-ending struggle with laboratory testing for Clostridium difficile infection
    Polage, Christopher R.
    Turkiewicz, Joanna V.
    Cohen, Stuart H.
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2016, 5 (02) : 113 - 116
  • [22] Comparison of testing approaches for Clostridium difficile infection at a large community hospital
    Grein, J. D.
    Ochner, M.
    Hoang, H.
    Jin, A.
    Morgan, M. A.
    Murthy, A. R.
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2014, 20 (01) : 65 - 69
  • [23] Kinetics of polymerase chain reaction positivity in patients with Clostridioides difficile infection
    Saha, Srishti
    Yadav, Devvrat
    Pardi, Ryan
    Patel, Robin
    Khanna, Sahil
    Pardi, Darrell
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 14
  • [24] Leukemoid reaction to Clostridium difficile infection
    Naaraayan, Ashutossh
    Aleta, Melissa
    Basak, Prasanta
    Jesmajian, Stephen
    Goldstein, Robert
    ANAEROBE, 2015, 34 : 158 - 160
  • [25] Is Repeat PCR Needed for Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection?
    Luo, Robert F.
    Banaei, Niaz
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 48 (10) : 3738 - 3741
  • [26] Real-time polymerase chain reaction correlates well with clinical diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection
    Berry, N.
    Sewell, B.
    Jafri, S.
    Puli, C.
    Vagia, S.
    Lewis, A. M.
    Davies, D.
    Rees, E.
    Ch'ng, C. L.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2014, 87 (02) : 109 - 114
  • [27] Detection of Clostridium difficile antigen and toxin in stool specimens: Comparison of the C. difficile quik chek complete enzyme immunoassay and GeneXpert C. difficile polymerase chain reaction assay
    Senok, Abiola C.
    Aldosari, Kamel M.
    Alowaisheq, Rayan A.
    Abid, Othman A.
    Alsuhaibani, Khalid A.
    Khan, Mohammad A.
    Somily, Ali M.
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 23 (04) : 259 - 262
  • [28] Impact of a Healthcare Provider Educational Intervention on Frequency of Clostridium difficile Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing in Children: A Segmented Regression Analysis
    Kociolek, Larry K.
    Bovee, Maria
    Carter, Donna
    Ciolino, Jody D.
    Patel, Rupal
    O'Donnell, Anna
    Rupp, Angela H.
    Zheng, Xiaotian
    Shulman, Stanford T.
    Patel, Sameer J.
    JOURNAL OF THE PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASES SOCIETY, 2017, 6 (02) : 142 - 148
  • [29] The utility of repeat enzyme immunoassay testing for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: A systematic review of the literature
    Garimella, P. S.
    Agarwal, R.
    Katz, A.
    JOURNAL OF POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2012, 58 (03) : 194 - 198
  • [30] Missed diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection; a prospective evaluation of unselected stool samples
    Reigadas, E.
    Alcala, L.
    Marin, M.
    Burillo, A.
    Munoz, P.
    Bouza, E.
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2015, 70 (03) : 264 - 272