An Evaluation of Repeat Stool Testing for Clostridium difficile Infection by Polymerase Chain Reaction

被引:25
|
作者
Khanna, Sahil [1 ]
Pardi, Darrell S. [1 ]
Rosenblatt, Jon E. [4 ]
Patel, Robin [2 ,3 ]
Kammer, Patricia P. [1 ]
Baddour, Larry M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Clin Microbiol, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Div Infect Dis, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Lab Med & Pathol, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
Clostridium difficile infection; polymerase chain reaction; laboratory testing; screening efficacy; CULTURE CYTOTOXICITY ASSAY; REAL-TIME PCR; ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY; DIAGNOSIS; TOXIN; DIARRHEA; GUIDELINES; COLITIS; SOCIETY; SAMPLES;
D O I
10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182432273
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Goals: To evaluate the yield of repeat stool polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in patients with suspected Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Background: CDI is a major challenge in health care due to its frequent occurrence and high associated costs. Enzyme immunoassay and PCR are commonly performed diagnostic tests for CDI. Methods: Our microbiology laboratory database was queried from January 1, 2008 to June 30, 2010 for all patients who underwent PCR stool testing for suspected CDI. Data collected included age, sex, number of stool tests performed within a 14-day period after the first test, and location of patient (inpatient vs. outpatient). Analyses were performed using JMP version 9.0.1. Results: PCR testing was performed in 15,515 patients. The median age was 58.3 years (range, 10 d to 104.3 y) and 46.2% of patients were women. Repeat testing was infrequent; 87.3% of patients had testing performed only once in a 14-day period. Increased age, male sex, and inpatient location were predictors of repeat testing. The median time between an initial test and the first repeat test was 5 days. After an initial negative test, the percentage of patients having a subsequent positive test was low (2.7% in 7 d and 3.2% in 14 d). The percentage of repeat tests that was positive within 7 days (2.9%) was lower than the percentage that was positive from day 8 to day 14 (4.8%, P = 0.05). Conclusions: Repeat testing for C. difficile has a low yield, and patients with an initial negative test should not routinely be retested.
引用
收藏
页码:846 / 849
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Potential value of repeat stool testing for Clostridium difficile stool toxin using enzyme immunoassay?
    Deshpande, Abhishek
    Pasupuleti, Vinay
    Pant, Chaitanya
    Hall, Geraldine
    Jain, Anil
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2010, 26 (11) : 2635 - 2641
  • [2] Repeat Stool Testing to Diagnose Clostridium difficile Infection Using Enzyme Immunoassay Does Not Increase Diagnostic Yield
    Deshpande, Abhishek
    Pasupuleti, Vinay
    Patel, Preethi
    Ajani, Gati
    Hall, Geraldine
    Hu, Bo
    Jain, Anil
    Rolston, David D. K.
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 9 (08) : 665 - U72
  • [3] Diagnostic Accuracy of Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction in Detection of Clostridium difficile in the Stool Samples of Patients With Suspected Clostridium difficile Infection: A Meta-Analysis
    Deshpande, Abhishek
    Pasupuleti, Vinay
    Rolston, David D. K.
    Jain, Anil
    Deshpande, Narayan
    Pant, Chaitanya
    Hernandez, Adrian V.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2011, 53 (07) : E81 - E90
  • [4] Clostridium difficile Ribotype 027: Relationship to Age, Detectability of Toxins A or B in Stool With Rapid Testing, Severe Infection, and Mortality
    Rao, Krishna
    Micic, Dejan
    Natarajan, Mukil
    Winters, Spencer
    Kiel, Mark J.
    Walk, Seth T.
    Santhosh, Kavitha
    Mogle, Jill A.
    Galecki, Andrzej T.
    Lebar, William
    Higgins, Peter D. R.
    Young, Vincent B.
    Aronoff, David M.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2015, 61 (02) : 233 - 241
  • [5] Laboratory Testing for Clostridium difficile Infection Light at the End of the Tunnel
    Peterson, Lance R.
    Mehta, Maitry S.
    Patel, Parul A.
    Hacek, Donna M.
    Harazin, Maureen
    Nagwekar, Payal P.
    Thomson, Richard B., Jr.
    Robicsek, Ari
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2011, 136 (03) : 372 - 380
  • [6] The evaluation of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in a community hospital
    Daniel, Aju
    Rapose, Alwyn
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 8 (02) : 155 - 160
  • [7] Rapid and accurate diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection by real-time polymerase chain reaction
    Song, Pil Hun
    Min, Jung Hwa
    Kim, You Sun
    Jo, Soo Yeon
    Kim, Eun Jin
    Lee, Kyung Jin
    Lee, Jeonghun
    Sung, Hyun
    Moon, Jeong Seop
    Whang, Dong Hee
    INTESTINAL RESEARCH, 2018, 16 (01) : 109 - 115
  • [8] Evaluation of a Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel Immunoassay in Stool Testing of Patients with Suspected Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile Infection
    Krutova, Marcela
    Briksi, Ales
    Tkadlec, Jan
    Zajac, Miroslav
    Matejkova, Jana
    Nyc, Otakar
    Drevinek, Pavel
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 57 (10)
  • [9] Detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile by polymerase chain reaction
    陈村龙
    周殿元
    潘令嘉
    王继德
    邓惠欢
    Journal of Medical Colleges of PLA, 1994, (01) : 24 - 26
  • [10] Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests for Clostridium difficile Infection
    Swindells, Jonathan
    Brenwald, Nigel
    Reading, Nathan
    Oppenheim, Beryl
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 48 (02) : 606 - 608