Deviating colostomy construction versus stent placement as bridge to surgery for malignant left-sided colonic obstruction

被引:30
作者
Amelung, Femke J. [1 ]
ter Borg, Frank [2 ]
Consten, Esther C. J. [1 ]
Siersema, Peter D. [3 ,4 ]
Draaisma, Werner A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Meander Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Maatweg 3, NL-3813 TZ Amersfoort, Netherlands
[2] Deventer Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Nico Bolkesteinlaan 75, NL-7416 SE Deventer, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Heidelberglaan 100, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, NL-6525 GA Nijmegen, Netherlands
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2016年 / 30卷 / 12期
关键词
Stent; SEMS; Colostomy; Colon carcinoma; Colonic obstruction; Bridge to surgery; LARGE-BOWEL OBSTRUCTION; EXPANDING METALLIC STENT; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; EMERGENCY-SURGERY; COLORECTAL-CANCER; RISK-FACTORS; PALLIATIVE TREATMENT; ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; ELECTIVE SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-016-4887-9
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Acute colonic decompression using a deviating colostomy (DC) or a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) has been shown to lead to fewer complications and permanent stomas compared to acute resection in elderly patients with malignant left-sided colonic obstruction (LSCO). However, no consensus exists on which decompression method is superior, especially in patients treated with curative intend. This retrospective study therefore aimed to compare both decompression methods in potentially curable LSCO patients. All LSCO patients treated with curative intent between 2004 and 2013 in two teaching hospitals were retrospectively identified. In one institution, a DC was the standard of care, whereas in the other all patients were treated with SEMS. In total, 88 eligible LSCO patients with limited disease and curative treatment options were included; 51 patients had a SEMS placed and 37 patients a DC constructed. All patients eventually underwent a subsequent elective resection. In sum, 235 patients were excluded due to benign or inoperable disease. No significant differences were found for hospital stay, morbidity, disease-free and overall survival and mortality. Major complications were seen in 13/51 (25.5 %) patients in the SEMS group and were mostly due to stent dysfunction (n = 7). Also, one stent-related perforation occurred. Major complications occurred in 4/37 (10.8 %) patients in the DC group, including abdominal sepsis (n = 3) and wound dehiscence (n = 1). Long-term complication rate was significantly higher in the DC group (29.7 vs. 9.8 %, p = 0.01), mainly due to a high incisional hernia rate. Fewer patients had a temporary colostomy following elective resection after SEMS placement (62.2 vs. 17.6 %, p < 0.01). Permanent colostomy rate was not significantly different. SEMS and DC are both effective decompression methods for curable LSCO patients with comparable short- and long-term oncological outcomes; however, more surgical procedures are performed after DC due to an increased number of temporary colostomies and incisional hernia repairs.
引用
收藏
页码:5345 / 5355
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Predictors of outcome in palliative colonic stent placement for malignant obstruction [J].
Abbott, S. ;
Eglinton, T. W. ;
Ma, Y. ;
Stevenson, C. ;
Robertson, G. M. ;
Frizelle, F. A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 101 (02) :121-126
[2]   Acute resection versus bridge to surgery with diverting colostomy for patients with acute malignant left sided colonic obstruction: Systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Amelung, Femke J. ;
Mulder, Charlotte L. J. ;
Verheijen, Paul M. ;
Draaisma, Werner A. ;
Siersema, Peter D. ;
Consten, Esther C. J. .
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2015, 24 (04) :313-321
[3]   Quality of Life Outcomes in Patients Living with Stoma [J].
Anaraki, Fakhrialsadat ;
Vafaie, Mohamad ;
Behboo, Roobic ;
Maghsoodi, Nakisa ;
Esmaeilpour, Sahar ;
Safaee, Azadeh .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 2012, 18 (03) :176-180
[4]   Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Incidence of Incisional Hernia at the Site of Stoma Closure [J].
Bhangu, Aneel ;
Nepogodiev, Dmitri ;
Futaba, Kaori .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 36 (05) :973-983
[5]   Current Management of Surgical Oncologic Emergencies [J].
Bosscher, Marianne R. F. ;
van Leeuwen, Barbara L. ;
Hoekstra, Harald J. .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (05)
[6]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[7]   Trends in frequency and management of obstructing colorectal cancers in a well-defined population [J].
Cheynel, Nicolas ;
Cortet, Marion ;
Lepage, Come ;
Benoit, Laurent ;
Faivre, Jean ;
Bouvier, Anne-Marie .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (10) :1568-1575
[8]   Long-term oncologic outcomes of endoscopic stenting as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction: comparison with emergency surgery [J].
Choi, Ji Min ;
Lee, Changhyun ;
Han, Yoo Min ;
Lee, Minjong ;
Choi, Young Hoon ;
Jang, Dong Kee ;
Im, Jong Pil ;
Kim, Sang Gyun ;
Kim, Joo Sung ;
Jung, Hyun Chae .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (09) :2649-2655
[9]   Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J].
Dindo, D ;
Demartines, N ;
Clavien, PA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :205-213
[10]   Long-term mortality and recurrence after colorectal cancer surgery with preoperative stenting: a Danish nationwide cohort study [J].
Erichsen, Rune ;
Horvath-Puho, Erzsebet ;
Jacobsen, Jacob Bonde ;
Nilsson, Tove ;
Baron, John A. ;
Sorensen, Henrik Toft .
ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 47 (06) :518-525