The effect of different sampling intervals on the measurement of intrapartum fetal heart rate variability

被引:6
作者
Wilcox, MA
Wang, W
Sahota, DS
Dawkins, RR
Chung, TKH
Chang, AMZ
机构
[1] PRINCE WALES HOSP, CHINESE UNIV HONG KONG, DEPT OBSTET & GYNAECOL, SHATIN, NT, HONG KONG
[2] UNIV NOTTINGHAM, DEPT OBSTET & GYNAECOL, NOTTINGHAM NG7 2RD, ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00060-4
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To test the hypothesis that increasing the sampling interval affects the intrapartum fetal heart rate (FHR) variability measurement. Methods: Fetal electrocardiograms were obtained from women in labor. Using the peak of the fetal R wave, the R-R interval and FHR were calculated on a beat-to-beat basis. Retrospectively, the original data were repartitioned using different intervals (2-900 seconds) to generate a window of measurement (epoch). The mean value for each epoch and the last FHR in that epoch (epochal value) were compared with published animal and human data. Errors were quantified by comparing the epochal and mean values for each epoch. Fetal heart rate variability between epochs and within each epoch was compared. Results: Fetal heart rate and R-R interval were measured in 146 cases. The FHR had a normal distribution (mean 140.1 beats per minute, +/- standard deviation [SD] 15.6, skew -0.07), but its inverse, the R-R interval, was not normally distributed (mean 432 milliseconds, +/- SD 52.4, skew 1.78). Using a single value for an epoch duration of 2 seconds resulted in an error that was similar to the within-epoch variability (+/- SD of 2.2 beats per minute difference between mean and epochal value compared to +/- SD of 2 beats per minute within epoch) but which increased with epoch duration. Conclusion: An epoch duration of 2 seconds and a single sampled value within this period may be appropriate for measurement of both medium and long-term variability in any computerized intrapartum FHR interpretation system. Fetal heart rate (not R-R interval, because of its normal distribution) should be used to design such a computerized system. (C) 1997 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 580
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of Chronic Maternal Methadone Therapy on Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Patterns
    William Andres Rarnirez-Cacho
    Stephanie Flores
    Ron M. Schrader
    Jaymi McKay
    William F. Rayburn
    The Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation: JSGI, 2006, 13 : 108 - 111
  • [32] Effect of chronic maternal methadone therapy on intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns
    Ramirez-Cacho, WA
    Flores, S
    Schrader, RM
    McKay, J
    Rayburn, WF
    JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR GYNECOLOGIC INVESTIGATION, 2006, 13 (02) : 108 - 111
  • [33] The effect of epidural analgesia on fetal heart rate variability
    Moreno-Martinez, M. D.
    Aibar-Villan, L.
    Valverde-Pareja, M.
    Aguilar-Romero, M. T.
    Lopez-Gallego, M. F.
    Puertas, A.
    ADVANCES IN PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2010, : 567 - 569
  • [34] Effect of cold on fetal heart rate and its variability
    Yu, ZY
    Lumbers, ER
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 27 (08) : 607 - 611
  • [36] Interpretation of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings - Reply
    Parer, JT
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 179 (04) : 1099 - 1100
  • [37] Sparse learning for Intrapartum fetal heart rate analysis
    Abry, P.
    Spilka, J.
    Leonarduzzi, R.
    Chudacek, V.
    Pustelnik, N.
    Doret, M.
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2018, 4 (03):
  • [39] Temporal Evolution of Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Features
    Vargas-Calixto, Johann
    Wu, Yvonne
    Kuzniewicz, Michael
    Cornet, Marie-Coralie
    Forquer, Heather
    Gerstley, Lawrence
    Hamilton, Emily
    Warrick, Philip
    Kearney, Robert
    2021 COMPUTING IN CARDIOLOGY (CINC), 2021,
  • [40] The signifiance of the duration of intrapartum fetal heart rate variability in predicting the development of significant neonatal acidosis
    Williams, K
    Galerneau, F
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (06) : S130 - S130