A study of two penalty-parameterless constraint handling techniques in the framework of MOEA/D

被引:162
作者
Jan, Muhammad Asif [1 ]
Khanum, Rashida Adeeb [2 ]
机构
[1] KUST, Dept Math, Kohat 26000, Khyber Pakhtunk, Pakistan
[2] Univ Essex, Dept Math Sci, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
关键词
Constrained multiobjective optimization; Constraint-domination principle; Decomposition; MOEA/D; Stochastic ranking; GENETIC LOCAL SEARCH; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHM; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2012.07.027
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Penalty functions are frequently employed for handling constraints in constrained optimization problems (COPs). In penalty function methods, penalty coefficients balance objective and penalty functions. However, finding appropriate penalty coefficients to strike the right balance is often very hard. They are problems dependent. Stochastic ranking (SR) and constraint-domination principle (CDP) are two promising penalty functions based constraint handling techniques that avoid penalty coefficients. In this paper, the extended/modified versions of SR and CDP are implemented for the first time in the multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition (MOEA/D) framework. This led to two new algorithms, CMOEA/D-DE-SR and CMOEA/D-DE-CDP. The performance of these new algorithms is tested on CTP-series and CF-series test instances in terms of the HV-metric, IGD-metric, and SC-metric. The experimental results are compared with NSGA-II, IDEA, and the three best performers of CEC 2009 MOEA competition, which showed better and competitive performance of the proposed algorithms on most test instances of the two test suits. The sensitivity of the performance of proposed algorithms to parameters is also investigated. The experimental results reveal that CDP works better than SR in the MOEA/D framework. (C) 2012 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 148
页数:21
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, P EUROGEN C
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIM
[3]   Normal-boundary intersection: A new method for generating the Pareto surface in nonlinear multicriteria optimization problems [J].
Das, I ;
Dennis, JE .
SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION, 1998, 8 (03) :631-657
[4]   An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms [J].
Deb, K .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2000, 186 (2-4) :311-338
[5]  
Deb K, 2001, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V1993, P284
[6]   A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II [J].
Deb, K ;
Pratap, A ;
Agarwal, S ;
Meyarivan, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (02) :182-197
[7]  
Deb K., 2010, MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIM
[8]  
FONSECA CM, 1993, PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GENETIC ALGORITHMS, P416
[9]  
Gass S., 1955, NAV RES LOG, V2, P39, DOI DOI 10.1002/NAV.3800020106
[10]   Implicit Niching in a Learning Classifier System: Nature's Way [J].
Horn, Jeffrey ;
Goldberg, David E. ;
Deb, Kalyanmoy .
EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 1994, 2 (01) :37-66