A novel approach to relative importance ratings of customer requirements in QFD based on probabilistic linguistic preferences

被引:21
作者
Du, Yinfeng [1 ]
Liu, Dun [1 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Relative importance ratings; Customer requirements; Probabilistic linguistic preferences; Weights of evaluators; PLEV operator; Probabilistic linguistic-based GRA-TOPSIS method; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT; TERM SETS;
D O I
10.1007/s10700-020-09347-4
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Quality function deployment (QFD) is a customer-oriented product/service design tool with diversified team members reaching a consensus in developing a new or an improved product/service to maximize customer satisfaction. Determining the relative importance ratings (RIRs) of customer requirements (CRs) is actually a multiple attribute decision making (MADM) problem, which is regarded as an essential step in QFD application. Although many decision making approaches have been developed to rate the CRs, few of them refer to derive the weights of evaluators, and there is paucity of literature which combines the probabilistic linguistic term sets (PLTSs) with QFD methodology. Therefore, PLTSs are introduced in our study, to simultaneously reflect the hesitancy and preference degrees of evaluators. A novel MADM technique based on probabilistic linguistic preference (PLP) is explored to calculate the RIRs among CRs under the PLP environment. Concretely, some operators, such as the normalization formulas, the probabilistic linguistic expected value (PLEV) operator as well as the standard formula, are applied to weight the decision makers; a modified grey relational analysis-technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (GRA-TOPSIS) method called probabilistic linguistic-based GRA-TOPSIS is also proposed to rate the relative importance over CRs. Finally, application of product improvement of a turbine engine is given to see the validity and feasibility of the proposed approach.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 395
页数:31
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   DELEGATION PROCESS FOR COMBINING INDIVIDUAL UTILITY-FUNCTIONS [J].
BODILY, SE .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1979, 25 (10) :1035-1041
[2]  
Gu H, 2009, J SYST ENG ELECTRON, V20, P106
[3]   A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision making [J].
Herrera, F ;
Herrera-Viedma, E ;
Martínez, L .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 114 (01) :43-58
[4]   Strategic logistics outsourcing: An integrated QFD and fuzzy AHP approach [J].
Ho, William ;
He, Ting ;
Lee, Carman Ka Man ;
Emrouznejad, Ali .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (12) :10841-10850
[5]   Performance evaluation of eco-industrial thermal power plants by using fuzzy GRA-VIKOR and combination weighting techniques [J].
Li, Nana ;
Zhao, Huiru .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 135 :169-183
[6]   Determining the importance ratings of customer requirements in quality function deployment based on interval linguistic information [J].
Li, Yan-Lai ;
Du, Yin-Feng ;
Chin, Kwai-Sang .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2018, 56 (14) :4692-4708
[7]   A survey of decision-making methods with probabilistic linguistic information: bibliometrics, preliminaries, methodologies, applications and future directions [J].
Liao, Huchang ;
Mi, Xiaomei ;
Xu, Zeshui .
FUZZY OPTIMIZATION AND DECISION MAKING, 2020, 19 (01) :81-134
[8]   A fuzzy-AHP approach to prioritization of CS attributes in target planning for automotive product development [J].
Nepal, Bimal ;
Yadav, Om P. ;
Murat, Alper .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (10) :6775-6786
[9]   Probabilistic linguistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making [J].
Pang, Qi ;
Wang, Hai ;
Xu, Zeshui .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2016, 369 :128-143
[10]   An integrated framework for mechatronics based product development in a fuzzy environment [J].
Parameshwaran, R. ;
Baskar, C. ;
Karthik, T. .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2015, 27 :376-390