Bioencapsulation of microbial inoculants for better soil-plant fertilization. A review

被引:147
作者
Schoebitz, Mauricio [1 ]
Lopez, Maria D. [2 ]
Roldan, Antonio [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIC Ctr Edafol & Biol Aplicada Segura, Dept Soil & Water Conservat, Murcia 30100, Spain
[2] Inst Murciano Invest & Desarrollo & Agr Alimentar, Murcia 30150, Spain
关键词
Immobilization; Microencapsulation; Spray drying; Cross-linking; Coacervation; Carrier material; Shelf-life; PGPR/PGPB; GROWTH-PROMOTING BACTERIA; WASTE-WATER TREATMENT; ALGINATE BEADS; PHOSPHATE SOLUBILIZATION; PSEUDOMONAS-FLUORESCENS; AZOSPIRILLUM-BRASILENSE; LACTOCOCCUS-LACTIS; CONTROLLED-RELEASE; FLAVOR ENCAPSULATION; BIOLOGICAL-CONTROL;
D O I
10.1007/s13593-013-0142-0
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Plant fertilization is a major issue in the context of increasing population and food risk, higher cost of fertilizers, and low target efficiency of traditional mineral fertilization practices. Alternatively, application of microbial inoculants to the soil can enhance the uptake of nutrients by plants and increase the efficiency of mineral fertilizers and manures. Encapsulation methods involve covering and protecting the microorganisms. Encapsulation of bacterial cells has been challenged and used mainly in the agricultural industry using processes, such as spray drying, interfacial polymerization, or cross-linking. Here, we review techniques for microbial inoculants and their benefits for sustainable agriculture. Techniques include fluidized bed, extrusion, molecular inclusion, coacervation, liposomes, ionic or inverse gelation, and oil-entrapped emulsion. Major topics discussed are formulation of microbial inoculants, conventional inoculants, bioencapsulation materials, bioencapsulation techniques, and future trends. We found that (1) conventional inoculant does not provide adequate protection for microorganisms. (2) Bioencapsulation improves the protection and controlled release of bacteria. (3) Sodium alginate is one of the most used products for the bioencapsulation of microorganisms. (4) The bioencapsulation of microbial inoculants is performed with the incorporation of an active ingredient into a matrix followed by a mechanical operation, and finally stabilization by a chemical or physical-chemical process. (5) Spray-drying process works on a continuous basis, low operating cost, and high quality of capsules in good yield, although the high temperature used in the process is not very appropriate for encapsulating non-spore-forming bacteria. 6) Fluid-bed process is a promising encapsulation technique for large-scale production in agricultural industry. (7) Ionic gelation is currently the most adequate method found to encapsulate bacteria. (8) Some advantages and drawbacks are found for each technique; therefore, the selection of suitable bioencapsulation method will depend on bacteria strain, cost, processing conditions, and handling.
引用
收藏
页码:751 / 765
页数:15
相关论文
共 127 条
[21]   Poultry manure and banana waste are effective biofertilizer carriers for promoting plant growth and soil sustainability in banana crops [J].
del Carmen Rivera-Cruz, Maria ;
Trujillo Narcia, Antonio ;
Cordova Ballona, Georgina ;
Kohler, Josef ;
Caravaca, Fuensanta ;
Roldan, Antonio .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2008, 40 (12) :3092-3095
[22]   A multi-site field evaluation of granular inoculants for legume nodulation [J].
Denton, Matthew D. ;
Pearce, David J. ;
Ballard, Ross A. ;
Hannah, Murray C. ;
Mutch, Lesley A. ;
Norng, Sorn ;
Slattery, Jo F. .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2009, 41 (12) :2508-2516
[23]   Field performance of a liquid formulation of Azospirillum brasilense on dryland wheat productivity [J].
Diaz-Zorita, Martin ;
Virginia Fernandez-Canigia, Maria .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL BIOLOGY, 2009, 45 (01) :3-11
[24]   Responses of agronomically important crops to inoculation with Azospirillum [J].
Dobbelaere, S ;
Croonenborghs, A ;
Thys, A ;
Ptacek, D ;
Vanderleyden, J ;
Dutto, P ;
Labandera-Gonzalez, C ;
Caballero-Mellado, J ;
Aguirre, JF ;
Kapulnik, Y ;
Brener, S ;
Burdman, S ;
Kadouri, D ;
Sarig, S ;
Okon, Y .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 28 (09) :871-879
[25]   POLYACRYLAMIDE-ENTRAPPED RHIZOBIUM AS AN INOCULANT FOR LEGUMES [J].
DOMMERGUES, YR ;
DIEM, HG ;
DIVIES, C .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1979, 37 (04) :779-781
[26]  
FAGES J, 1992, SYMBIOSIS, V13, P15
[27]   Inoculants of Azospirillum brasilense: Biomass production, survival and growth promotion of Setaria italica and Zea mays [J].
Fallik, E ;
Okon, Y .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1996, 28 (01) :123-126
[28]   ALGINATE PRODUCTION BY PLANT-PATHOGENIC PSEUDOMONADS [J].
FETT, WF ;
OSMAN, SF ;
FISHMAN, ML ;
SIEBLES, TS .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1986, 52 (03) :466-473
[29]   CHARACTERIZATION OF EXOPOLYSACCHARIDES PRODUCED BY PLANT-ASSOCIATED FLUORESCENT PSEUDOMONADS [J].
FETT, WF ;
OSMAN, SF ;
DUNN, MF .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1989, 55 (03) :579-583
[30]   AN INVESTIGATION OF INTERNAL PHASE LOSSES DURING THE MICROENCAPSULATION OF FRAGRANCES [J].
FLORES, RJ ;
WALL, MD ;
CARNAHAN, DW ;
OROFINO, TA .
JOURNAL OF MICROENCAPSULATION, 1992, 9 (03) :287-307