Clostridium difficile infection diagnostics - evaluation of the C. DIFF Quik Chek Complete assay, a rapid enzyme immunoassay for detection of toxigenic C. difficile in clinical stool samples

被引:8
作者
Johansson, Karin [1 ]
Karlsson, Hanna [1 ]
Noren, Torbjorn [2 ]
机构
[1] Orebro Univ Hosp, Mol Diagnost, Dept Lab Med, SE-70185 Orebro, Sweden
[2] Univ Orebro, Fac Med & Hlth, Dept Lab Med Clin Microbiol, Orebro, Sweden
关键词
Clostridium difficile; diagnostics; glutamate dehydrogenase; toxin A/B EIA; GLUTAMATE-DEHYDROGENASE; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; MICROBIOLOGY; CDI;
D O I
10.1111/apm.12595
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Diagnostic testing for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has, in recent years, seen the introduction of rapid dual-EIA (enzyme immunoassay) tests combining species-specific glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) with toxin A/B. In a prospective study, we compared the C. DIFF Quik Chek Complete test to a combination of selective culture (SC) and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) of the toxin A gene. Of 419 specimens, 68 were positive in SC including 62 positive in LAMP (14.7%). The combined EIA yielded 82 GDH positives of which 47 were confirmed toxin A/B positive (11%) corresponding to a sensitivity and specificity of 94% for GDH EIA compared to SC and for toxin A/B EIA a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 99% compared to LAMP. Twenty different PCR ribotypes were evenly distributed except for UK 081 where only 25% were toxin A/B positive compared to LAMP. We propose a primary use of a combined GDH toxin A/B EIA permitting a sensitive 1-h result of 379 of 419 (90%, all negatives plus GDH and toxin EIA positives) referred specimens. The remaining 10% being GDH positive should be tested for toxin A/B gene on the same day and positive results left to a final decision by the physician.
引用
收藏
页码:1016 / 1020
页数:5
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [31] Evaluation of four methods for detection of Clostridium difficile or C-difficile toxin: Cytotoxin assay, culture, latex agglutination, and a new-rapid immunoassay (C-difficile toxin A test)
    Fille, M
    Larcher, C
    Dierich, MP
    Allerberger, F
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 1998, 36 (02): : 143 - 149
  • [32] Performance evaluation of the Verigene® Clostridium difficile nucleic acid test, an automated multiplex molecular testing system for detection of C. difficile toxin
    Kosai, Kosuke
    Iwanaga, Yuki
    Akamatsu, Norihiko
    Okada, Yuya
    Kaku, Norihito
    Uno, Naoki
    Morinaga, Yoshitomo
    Hasegawa, Hiroo
    Miyazaki, Taiga
    Izumikawa, Koichi
    Mukae, Hiroshi
    Yanagihara, Katsunori
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2017, 23 (10) : 674 - 677
  • [33] A multicenter evaluation of a sample to answer real-time PCR assay for toxigenic C. difficile in symptomatic subjects
    Pancholi, Preeti
    Young, Steve
    Widen, R.
    Silbert, Suzane
    Schmitt, B.
    Dunn, R.
    Drain, A.
    Weissfeld, S. A.
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2020, 96 (01)
  • [34] Evaluation of the new CE-IVD marked BD MAX Cdiff Assay for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile harboring the tcdB gene from clinical stool samples
    Verhoeven, Paul O.
    Carricajo, Anne
    Pillet, Sylvie
    Ros, Alain
    Fonsale, Nathalie
    Botelho-Nevers, Elisabeth
    Lucht, Frederic
    Berthelot, Philippe
    Pozzetto, Bruno
    Grattard, Florence
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2013, 94 (01) : 58 - 60
  • [35] Comparative Evaluation of Luminex xTAG® Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel and Direct-From-Stool Real-Time PCR for Detection of C. difficile Toxin tcdB in Stool Samples from a Pediatric Population
    Tyrrell, Hannah
    Morin, Sarah B. N.
    Lloyd, Colin D.
    Parsons, Brendon
    Stokowski, Taryn
    Xie, Jianling
    Zhuo, Ran
    Lee, Bonita E.
    Pang, Xiao-Li
    Freedman, Stephen B.
    Chui, Linda
    MICROORGANISMS, 2022, 10 (11)