Clostridium difficile infection diagnostics - evaluation of the C. DIFF Quik Chek Complete assay, a rapid enzyme immunoassay for detection of toxigenic C. difficile in clinical stool samples

被引:8
作者
Johansson, Karin [1 ]
Karlsson, Hanna [1 ]
Noren, Torbjorn [2 ]
机构
[1] Orebro Univ Hosp, Mol Diagnost, Dept Lab Med, SE-70185 Orebro, Sweden
[2] Univ Orebro, Fac Med & Hlth, Dept Lab Med Clin Microbiol, Orebro, Sweden
关键词
Clostridium difficile; diagnostics; glutamate dehydrogenase; toxin A/B EIA; GLUTAMATE-DEHYDROGENASE; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; MICROBIOLOGY; CDI;
D O I
10.1111/apm.12595
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Diagnostic testing for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has, in recent years, seen the introduction of rapid dual-EIA (enzyme immunoassay) tests combining species-specific glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) with toxin A/B. In a prospective study, we compared the C. DIFF Quik Chek Complete test to a combination of selective culture (SC) and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) of the toxin A gene. Of 419 specimens, 68 were positive in SC including 62 positive in LAMP (14.7%). The combined EIA yielded 82 GDH positives of which 47 were confirmed toxin A/B positive (11%) corresponding to a sensitivity and specificity of 94% for GDH EIA compared to SC and for toxin A/B EIA a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 99% compared to LAMP. Twenty different PCR ribotypes were evenly distributed except for UK 081 where only 25% were toxin A/B positive compared to LAMP. We propose a primary use of a combined GDH toxin A/B EIA permitting a sensitive 1-h result of 379 of 419 (90%, all negatives plus GDH and toxin EIA positives) referred specimens. The remaining 10% being GDH positive should be tested for toxin A/B gene on the same day and positive results left to a final decision by the physician.
引用
收藏
页码:1016 / 1020
页数:5
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [21] Molecular test to determine toxigenic capabilities in GDH-positive, toxin-negative samples: evaluation of the Portrait toxigenic C. difficile assay
    Finch, L. S.
    Duncan, C. M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 70 (02) : 62 - 66
  • [22] Comparison of the Vidas C-difficile GDH Automated Enzyme-Linked Fluorescence Immunoassay (ELFA) with Another Commercial Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) (Quik Chek-60), Two Selective Media, and a PCR Assay for gluD for Detection of Clostridium difficile in Fecal Samples
    Davies, K. A.
    Berry, C. E.
    Morris, K. A.
    Smith, R.
    Young, S.
    Davis, T. E.
    Fuller, D. D.
    Buckner, R. J.
    Wilcox, M. H.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2015, 53 (06) : 1931 - 1934
  • [23] Detection of toxigenic Clostridioides [Clostridium] difficile: Usefulness of two commercially available enzyme immunoassays and a PCR assay on stool samples and stool isolates
    Legaria, Maria C.
    Rollet, Raquel
    Di Martino, Ana
    Castello, Liliana
    Barberis, Claudia
    Rossetti, Maria A.
    Guardati, Maria C.
    Fernandez Canigia, Liliana
    Carloni, Graciela
    Litterio, Mirta
    Rocchi, Marta
    Anchart, Eduardo G.
    Trejon, Fernando M.
    Minnaard, Jessica
    Klajn, Diana
    Predari, Silvia C.
    REVISTA ARGENTINA DE MICROBIOLOGIA, 2018, 50 (01): : 36 - 44
  • [24] Diagnosing Clostridioides difficile infections with molecular diagnostics: multicenter evaluation of revogene C. difficile assay
    Sambri, Vittorio
    Gateau, Cecile
    Zannoli, Silvia
    Dirani, Giorgio
    Couturier, Jeanne
    Op den Buijs, Ingrid
    Roymans, Rene
    Hallet, Emma
    Arnold, Mihaela
    Zumoberhaus, Anja
    Steiner, Stanislava
    van de Bovenkamp, Jeroen
    Altwegg, Martin
    Berlinger, Livia
    Barbut, Frederic
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 39 (06) : 1169 - 1175
  • [25] Detection of C. difficile toxin as a model assay for performing fully automated high-throughput RT-PCR on clinical stool samples
    Eigner, Ulrich
    Noerz, Dominik
    Reucher, Svenja
    Furrer, Jan
    Sun, Jingtao
    Chu, Kristina
    Kolb, Melissa
    Hefner, Nadine
    Pfefferle, Susanne
    Luetgehetmann, Marc
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2020, 172
  • [26] Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of the Xpert Clostridium difficile Assay and Its Comparison With the Toxin A/B Enzyme-Linked Fluorescent Assay and In-House Real-Time PCR Assay Used for the Detection of Toxigenic C. difficile
    Whang, Dong Hee
    Joo, Shin Young
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS, 2014, 28 (02) : 124 - 129
  • [27] Comparison of VIDAS CDAB and CDA immunoassay for the detection of Clostridium difficile in a tcdA- tcdB+ C. difficile prevalent area
    Shin, Bo-Moon
    Lee, Eun-Joo
    Kuak, Eun-Young
    Yoo, Soo Jin
    ANAEROBE, 2009, 15 (06) : 266 - 269
  • [28] Non-toxigenic Clostridioides (Formerly Clostridium) difficile for Prevention of C. difficile Infection: From Bench to Bedside Back to Bench and Back to Bedside
    Gerding, Dale N.
    Sambol, Susan P.
    Johnson, Stuart
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [29] Impact of changes in Clostridium difficile diagnostic testing on detection of C. difficile infection and all England mandatory surveillance data
    Chand, M. A.
    Fleming, M. J.
    Wellsteed, S.
    Kelsey, M. C.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2011, 79 (01) : 8 - 12
  • [30] Improved detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile using the Cepheid Xpert C difficile assay and impact on C difficile infection rates in a tertiary hospital: A double-edged sword
    Williamson, Deborah A.
    Basu, Indira
    Freeman, Joshua
    Swager, Terri
    Roberts, Sally A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2013, 41 (03) : 270 - 272