Contrast Enhancement of Scintigraphic Image Using Fuzzy Intensification

被引:0
作者
Pandey, Anil Kumar [1 ,3 ]
Dogra, Sakshi [1 ]
Sharma, Param Dev [2 ]
Jaleel, Jasim [1 ]
Patel, Chetan [1 ]
Kumar, Rakesh [1 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Nucl Med, New Delhi, India
[2] Univ Delhi, SGTB Khalsa Coll, Dept Comp Sci, New Delhi, India
[3] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Nucl Med, New Delhi 110029, India
来源
INDIAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE | 2022年 / 37卷 / 03期
关键词
Contrast enhancement; fuzzy intensification operator; scintigraphic image; HISTOGRAM EQUALIZATION; NOISE-REDUCTION; FILTERS;
D O I
10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_210_21
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction: The objective of this study was to see the effect of fuzzy intensification (INT) operator on enhancement of scintigraphic image. Materials and Methods: Nuclear medicine physician (NMP) provided 25 scintigraphic images that required enhancement. The image pixels value was converted into fuzzy plane and was subjected to contrast INT operator with parameters of INT operator i.e., cross-over = 0.5 and number of iterations = 1 and 2. The enhanced image was again brought back into spatial domain (de-fuzzification) whose intensity value was in the range 0-255. NMP compared the enhanced image with its input image and labeled it as acceptable or unacceptable. The quality of enhanced image was also accessed objectively using four different image metrics namely: Entropy, edge content, absolute mean brightness error and saturation metrics. Results: Most of the enhanced images (18 out of 25 images) obtained at cross-over = 0.5 and number of iterations = 1 are acceptable and found to have overall better contrast compared to the corresponding input image. Four images (two brain positron emission tomography scan and two I-131 scan) obtained at cross-over = 0.5 and with iteration = 2 are acceptable. Three input images (one dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA), one I-131 and one I-131- metaiodo-benzyl-guanidine (MIBG) scan) were better than their enhanced images. Conclusions: The enhancement produced by fuzzy INT operator was encouraging. Majority of enhanced images were acceptable at cross-over = 0.5 and number iterations = 1.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 216
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   A non-local algorithm for image denoising [J].
Buades, A ;
Coll, B ;
Morel, JM .
2005 IEEE COMPUTER SOCIETY CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, :60-65
[2]   Minimum mean brightness error bi-histogram equalization in contrast enhancement [J].
Chen, SD ;
Ramli, R .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, 2003, 49 (04) :1310-1319
[3]   BM3D Frames and Variational Image Deblurring [J].
Danielyan, Aram ;
Katkovnik, Vladimir ;
Egiazarian, Karen .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2012, 21 (04) :1715-1728
[4]   An optimal fuzzy system for color image enhancement [J].
Hamnandlu, Madasu ;
Jha, Devendra .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2006, 15 (10) :2956-2966
[5]  
Hautiere Nicolas, 2008, Image Analysis & Stereology, V27, P87, DOI 10.5566/ias.v27.p87-95
[6]  
Kwan HK, 2003, STUD FUZZ SOFT COMP, V122, P25
[7]   Weighted fuzzy mean filters for image processing [J].
Lee, CS ;
Kuo, YH ;
Yu, PT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1997, 89 (02) :157-180
[8]  
Mittal Preeti, 2019, Soft Computing: Theories and Applications. Proceedings of SoCTA 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (AISC 742), P537, DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-0589-4_50
[9]  
Nachtegael M, 2005, IEEE INT CONF FUZZY, P201
[10]   ENTROPIC THRESHOLDING [J].
PAL, NR ;
PAL, SK .
SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1989, 16 (02) :97-108