Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis

被引:264
作者
Behrens, JT
机构
[1] Methodological Studies, Division of Psychology in Education, Arizona State University, Tempe
关键词
D O I
10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Exploratory data analysis (EDA) is a well-established statistical tradition that provides conceptual and computational tools for discovering patterns to foster hypothesis development and refinement. These tools and attitudes complement the use of significance and hypothesis tests used in confirmatory data analysis (CDA). Although EDA complements rather than replaces CDA, use of CDA without EDA is seldom warranted. Even when well specified theories are held, EDA helps one interpret the results of CDA and may reveal unexpected or misleading patterns in the data. This article introduces the central heuristics and computational tools of EDA and contrasts it with CDA and exploratory statistics in general. EDA techniques are illustrated using previously published psychological data. Changes in statistical training and practice are recommended to incorporate these tools.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 160
页数:30
相关论文
共 131 条
[91]  
MCGUIRE WJ, 1989, PSYCHOL SCI CONTRIBU
[92]  
MITROFF II, 1979, MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLE, P104
[93]   BROADENING THE SCOPE OF STATISTICS AND STATISTICAL EDUCATION [J].
MOSTELLER, F .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1988, 42 (02) :93-99
[94]  
Mosteller F., 1977, DATA ANAL REGRESSION, P365
[95]   EXPLORATORY STATISTICS AND EMPIRICISM [J].
MULAIK, SA .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1985, 52 (03) :410-430
[96]   On the use and interpretation of certain test criteria for purposes of statistical inference Part I [J].
Neyman, J ;
Pearson, ES .
BIOMETRIKA, 1928, 20A :175-240
[97]   THE CASE OF THE VANISHING FREQUENCY EFFECT - A RETEST OF THE VERIFICATION MODEL [J].
PAAP, KR ;
JOHANSEN, LS .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1994, 20 (06) :1129-1157
[98]  
Ramsey J.K.a.J., 1980, EVALUATION ECONOMETR, P15
[99]   THE INTERPRETATION OF LEVELS OF SIGNIFICANCE BY PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCHERS [J].
ROSENTHAL, R ;
GAITO, J .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1963, 55 (01) :33-38
[100]   FURTHER EVIDENCE FOR THE CLIFF EFFECT IN THE INTERPRETATION OF LEVELS OF SIGNIFICANCE [J].
ROSENTHAL, R ;
GAITO, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1964, 15 (02) :570-570