Repeatability of Meibomian Gland Contrast, a Potential Indicator of Meibomian Gland Function

被引:22
|
作者
Yeh, Thao N. [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Meng C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Optometry, Clin Res Ctr, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Optometry, Vis Sci Grp, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
tear lipid layer; meibomian gland; tear film stability; meibomian gland expressibility; meibography; evaporative dry eye; meibomian gland dysfunction; meibomian gland contrast; isotretinoin; 13-cis-retinoic acid; accutane; contrast; meibomian gland intensity; intensity; dry eye; dry eye disease; repeatability; limits of agreement; 13-CIS RETINOIC ACID; TEAR-FILM; INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP; ANDROGEN DEFICIENCY; RISK-FACTORS; DYSFUNCTION; PREVALENCE; DISCOMFORT;
D O I
10.1097/ICO.0000000000001818
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: Meibomian gland contrast may be a potential indicator of gland health, especially among isotretinoin users. We aimed to develop a repeatable and reliable method for measuring Meibomian gland contrast from meibography images. Methods: Lower lid (LL) and upper lid (UL) meibography were captured with the OCULUS Keratograph 5M (OCULUS, Inc) at 2 visits under the following 4 conditions: face centered with room lights on (C), left-turned face (L), right-turned face (R), and face centered with room lights off (CLO). Contrast was measured with Fiji (v2.0.0-rc-59). Coefficient of repeatability and limits of agreement (LOA) were determined using Bland-Altman plots. Results: A total of 512 meibography images from 16 subjects (age +/- SD = 24.8 +/- 5.2 years; 13 female patients) were collected. Coefficient of repeatability between visits was 10.5 for UL and 14.9 for LL. Lower and upper LOA, respectively, for UL, compared with condition C, were -10.9 [95% confidence interval (CI), -13.5 to -8.3] and 6.2 (95% CI, 3.6-8.8) for L; -11.0 (95% CI, -13.8 to -8.1) and 7.0 (95% CI, 4.2-9.8) for R; and -9.0 (95% CI, -11.6 to -6.5) and 7.2 (95% CI, 4.7-9.8) for CLO. Lower and upper LOA, respectively, for LL, compared with condition C, were -18.1 (95% CI, -22.6 to -13.5) and 11.0 (95% CI, 6.5-15.5) for L; -15.3 (95% CI, -19.2 to -11.3) and 9.9 (95% CI, 6.0-13.9) for R; and -12.0 (95% CI, -15.1 to -8.8) and 8.2 (95% CI, 5.0-11.3) for CLO. Conclusions: Meibomian gland contrast is a repeatable and reliable measure for changes in Meibomian gland contrast greater than 11 in the UL and 18 in the LL.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 261
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Adverse Events of Intense Pulsed Light Combined With Meibomian Gland Expression Versus Meibomian Gland Expression in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
    Qiao, Chen
    Li, Liping
    Wang, Haoyu
    Zhao, Cong
    Ke, Lan
    Sen, Dan
    Qi, Mengying
    Li, Shaowei
    Wang, Mingwu
    Zeng, Qingyan
    LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE, 2021, 53 (05) : 664 - 670
  • [22] Effect of Meibomian Gland Expression on Optical Quality in Patients with Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
    Li, Hongzhe
    Tong, Wentao
    Hu, Man
    Meng, Ziqi
    Chang, Pingjun
    Zhao, Yune
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2025,
  • [23] Intraductal meibomian gland probing and its efficacy in the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction
    Magno, Morten
    Moschowits, Emily
    Arita, Reiko
    Vehof, Jelle
    Utheim, Tor Paaske
    SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 66 (04) : 612 - 622
  • [24] A review of rabbit models of meibomian gland dysfunction and scope for translational research
    Prasad, Deeksha
    Salman, Mohd
    Reddy, A. Anirudh
    Jaffet, Jilu
    Sahoo, Abhishek
    Jakati, Saumya
    Bokara, Kiran Kumar
    Singh, Swati
    Basu, Sayan
    Singh, Vivek
    Donthineni, Pragnya Rao
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 71 (04) : 1227 - 1236
  • [25] The impact of contact lenses on meibomian gland morphology
    Osae, Eugene Appenteng
    Jones, Lyndon
    Nichols, Jason J.
    OCULAR SURFACE, 2022, 24 : 148 - 155
  • [26] Changes in the Meibomian Gland After Exposure to Intense Pulsed Light in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) Patients
    Yin, Yue
    Liu, Ninghua
    Gong, Lan
    Song, Nan
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2018, 43 (03) : 308 - 313
  • [27] Meibomian gland Dropout in Chinese cataract patients
    Ge, Jinling
    Duan, Lian
    Wang, Chaoqing
    Zheng, Xiuhua
    Wang, Lihua
    BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH-INDIA, 2017, 28 (07): : 3072 - 3077
  • [28] Infrared thermography in the evaluation of meibomian gland dysfunction
    Su, Tai-Yuan
    Ho, Wei-Ting
    Chiang, Shu-Chiung
    Lu, Chien-Yi
    Chiang, Huihua Kenny
    Chang, Shu-Wen
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 116 (07) : 554 - 559
  • [29] Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Associated With Periocular Radiotherapy
    Woo, Young Jun
    Ko, JaeSang
    Ji, Yong Woo
    Kim, Tae-im
    Yoon, Jin Sook
    CORNEA, 2017, 36 (12) : 1486 - 1491
  • [30] Models for Meibomian gland dysfunction: In vivo and in vitro
    Bu, Jinghua
    Guo, Yuli
    Wu, Yang
    Zhang, Rongrong
    Zhuang, Jingbin
    Zhao, Jiankai
    Sun, Le
    Quantock, Andrew J.
    Liu, Zuguo
    Li, Wei
    OCULAR SURFACE, 2024, 32 : 154 - 165